Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Merz flies to Washington with an agreed European position on tariffs — why it matters for Ukraine

The German chancellor promised to uphold a unified EU position vis‑à‑vis the US amid Supreme Court rulings and new global tariffs — developments that pose risks to supply chains, prices and defense cooperation that directly affect Ukrainian interests.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Merz flies to Washington with an agreed European position on tariffs — why it matters for Ukraine
Дональд Трамп і Фрідріх Мерц (Фото: WILL OLIVER / EPA)

Merz: I will go to Washington with a single European position

Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz said in an interview with German broadcasters (according to Reuters) that he will travel to the United States "with a coordinated European position" on tariffs. That message serves two purposes: to show coordination within the EU and to emphasize that tariff policy is the competence of the Union, not individual capitals.

"We will have a very clear European position on this matter, because tariff policy is a matter for the European Union, not individual member states, and I will go to Washington with a coordinated European position"

— Friedrich Merz, Chancellor of Germany

Context: the court, new tariffs and the timeline

On 20 February the U.S. Supreme Court ruled most of the previous administration's tariffs unlawful, but, as Reuters and Politico report, the administration responded with a new scheme — introducing global tariffs under a different law. U.S. Trade Representative Jamison Greer confirmed that sectoral tariffs will remain in effect, and the president himself announced an increase in tariffs from 10% to 15%, which are to take effect on 24 February and last for 150 days.

Why this matters for Europe — and for Ukraine

Uncertainty over tariffs hits investments and supply chains. For the EU — it is a question of competitiveness for the automotive industry, metallurgy and energy components. For Ukraine such changes matter twice: first, as part of shared supply chains (metal, components, logistics), and second, because of the impact on prices in partner economies and on the ability to rebuild critical infrastructure and make defense purchases.

European and American experts warn: prolonged uncertainty undermines investors' plans and delays the restoration of production lines. As Merz noted in a conversation with Politico, in the long term tariffs harm not only exporters but also consumers in the country that imposes them.

"The greatest poison for the economies of Europe and the United States is constant uncertainty over tariffs. And this uncertainty must end"

— Friedrich Merz, Chancellor of Germany

What could happen next — and how to respond

Merz is due to meet with the U.S. president in early March. On the table are several scenarios: a diplomatic settlement with exemptions for critical sectors, temporary compromises, or escalation with additional restrictions. For Ukraine it is important that the EU secures clear guarantees regarding supply chains and special cooperation regimes in the defense and reconstruction spheres.

Brief summary

Merz's message is a signal of EU unity toward the United States. But the real test will come when declarations turn into concrete agreements: mechanisms to reduce uncertainty, exemptions for critical chains and coordination on defense supplies. The question for partners is whether there will be enough political will to put trade stability above short-term tactical moves.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026