Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Merz: Russia 'in a state of deep barbarism' — what it means for the security of Europe and Ukraine

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says that normal relations with Russia are currently unlikely. We explain why his assessment matters for Ukraine's security and for European strategy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Merz: Russia 'in a state of deep barbarism' — what it means for the security of Europe and Ukraine
Фрідріх Мерц (Фото: Bihlmayer Michael/EPA)

Essence of the statement

Friedrich Merz's interview for the German outlet Die Rheinpfalz contains a harsh diagnosis: in his view, Russia today is "a country in a state of deep barbarism," and a return to "normal" relations is unlikely. Merz links this position to the idea that the regime allegedly has no internal demobilization plan and therefore must maintain its war machine.

"So we should have no illusions: the Russian authorities cannot do without war in the near future. They must keep the war machine running..."

— Friedrich Merz, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany (interview with Die Rheinpfalz)

Why this matters for Ukraine

Merz offers not only a moral assessment but also a practical conclusion: the war, in his view, will end when one side is exhausted militarily or economically. Therefore, Europe's working goal is to reduce Russia's ability to fight and to finance the war. For Ukraine, this means: partners' attention must focus not only on declarations but on supplying weapons, sanctions pressure, and economic measures that actually reduce the aggressor's resources.

"I consider this practically impossible. Looking at this regime and this blind, unrestrained terror, I have almost no hope"

— Friedrich Merz, on the possibility of restoring normal relations with Putin (interview with Die Rheinpfalz)

Context in European politics

This harsh assessment coincides with part of the European debate about how to deal with the Kremlin. On 19 December 2025 Emmanuel Macron expressed the view that Europe should renew dialogue with Russia. By contrast, on 14 February 2026 Volodymyr Zelensky called for coordination of negotiating approaches, warning that Putin would try to divide Europe. The difference in approaches — between a desire for diplomatic return and the need to maintain pressure — is already shaping partners' policy.

Practical consequences

If Merz's assessment withstands the test of time, the conclusions are clear: a long-term strategy of deterrence and reconstruction must be planned. This includes strengthening sanction mechanisms, controlling flows of financing to Russia, resilient supply chains for defense equipment, and preparation for rebuilding infrastructure in Ukraine. European experts emphasize that decisions must be systemic — from policy to budgets.

Conclusion

Merz challenges illusions about a quick return to pre-war normality. The question is whether European capitals will turn this diagnosis into concrete steps that strengthen Ukraine's security and reduce Russia's ability to wage war. Whether there will be sufficient political will and resources is the key question for the coming months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026