Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"A mine the size of a bottle cap: how 'Pryanik' became a weapon against civilian streets"

Russia is systematically using remotely scattered anti-personnel mines "Prynik" (Gingerbread) in residential areas — from Nikopol to Kherson. Their main characteristic is invisibility, not lethality.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 6, 2026 · 2 min read

"A mine the size of a bottle cap: how 'Pryanik' became a weapon against civilian streets"
Замінована територія (Фото: ДСНС Харківщини)

At the beginning of April 2026, residents of Nikopol were warned: mines could be lying on city streets. Not near the front lines — in the city itself. Small plastic objects measuring 5-6 centimeters in diameter, resembling a washer or bottle cap. Their official name is the "Prynik" anti-personnel mine (also known as "Plyushka"). Russians distribute them remotely — via drones or artillery cluster munitions.

Weapons Not for the Front

The "Prynik" is not designed to kill — it is designed to injure. The charge is relatively small, but sufficient to seriously wound the foot or limb of a person who steps on it. This very logic — to incapacitate a person rather than kill them — makes this type of weapon especially dangerous in civilian areas: one victim requires several rescuers and medical resources.

According to sappers, the mine is triggered by pressure — when a foot presses on the entire body containing the liquid explosive substance. The plastic casing is poorly visible to a metal detector. On asphalt, in grass, or among garbage, it is virtually invisible.

"We urge you not to travel through the specified area. The minefield may be larger."

Kherson Regional Police, April 3, 2026

Not Just Nikopol

The appearance of "Pryniki" in Nikopol is not an isolated case. During the first week of April 2026, such mines were detected in at least three populated areas: in Nikopol in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, in Komyshany, and directly in Kherson — on Zalaegerszeg Street between Universytska and Perekopska streets. In Kherson, mines were also found on a car bridge across the Kosheva River. Oleksandr Prokudin, head of the Kherson Regional Military Administration, noted that "the mines are difficult to spot: they hide in grass, garbage, or on asphalt."

Remote mining of the right bank of Kherson region began in the first days of the full-scale invasion, but after deoccupation, it took on, according to local law enforcement assessments, a systematic character: explosive devices are increasingly being found precisely in residential neighborhoods rather than at industrial or strategic facilities.

What to Do If You Find One

  • Do not approach, do not touch, do not attempt to move it
  • Document the location visually (photo from a distance, landmarks)
  • Call 101 (Emergency Services) or 102 (Police)
  • Warn people nearby and move away from the object at least 200 meters

The Ministry of Internal Affairs and local authorities emphasize: the minefield may always turn out to be larger than the detected area — a drone or cluster munition scatters mines chaotically, and no map is comprehensive.

So far, Ukraine does not have a systematic public registry of remotely mined civilian territories in real time — the question is whether this will change now that "Pryniki" have begun appearing not in frontline fields, but on city streets hundreds of kilometers away from the trenches.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026