Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Estonia's Defense Minister: Europe is not ready to defend itself alone — and relies on the US

Hanno Pevkur openly acknowledged: without the American security umbrella, Europe is currently vulnerable. But this frankness raises an uncomfortable question about the pace of its own defense efforts.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 17, 2026 · 1 min read

Estonia's Defense Minister: Europe is not ready to defend itself alone — and relies on the US
Ханно Певкур (Фото: Jim Lo Scalzo / EPA)

Estonian Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur publicly confirmed what Brussels prefers to discuss more cautiously: Europe today is unable to independently ensure its own military security. According to him, in the event of Russian aggression, the USA will protect NATO allies — and the current balance of deterrence rests on this.

The Estonian minister's statement sounded not as a warning, but as a statement of fact. Estonia — a country with a population of 1.4 million and a shared border with Russia — has long spent over 3% of its GDP on defence and understands the real cost of security better than most alliance partners. This is why Pevkur's words should be read not as reassurance, but as a diagnosis.

The problem is not that the USA theoretically might not protect Europe. The problem is that dependence on a single guarantor is a structural vulnerability that Moscow carefully calculates. Any domestic political turbulence in Washington, any bargaining over the conditions for support transforms this dependence into a variable, not a constant.

Most EU countries have still not reached even the minimum NATO threshold of 2% of GDP for defence. The European defence initiative exists mainly in the form of declarations and start-up funds — without a common army, without unified command, without consensus on strategic autonomy.

Pevkur, in effect, said out loud what is a working prerequisite of NATO planning. But this honesty sharpens the question that still remains unanswered: if Europe knows about its unpreparedness — by what criteria and by what year does it plan to overcome this unpreparedness?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026