Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Moldovan Jury Gave Ukraine Zero Points at Eurovision — Broadcaster Director Resigns

# Moldovan Viewers Give Romania Maximum 12 Points, Jury Awards Only 3. Ukraine Receives Nothing Moldovan television viewers awarded Romania the maximum 12 points, while the jury gave the country only three. Ukraine received no points. Vlad Tsurcan, the general director of Teleradio-Moldova, called this an "extraordinary event" and submitted his resignation to "send a clear signal."

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 2 min read

Moldovan Jury Gave Ukraine Zero Points at Eurovision — Broadcaster Director Resigns
Влад Цуркану (Фото: Facebook-акаунт посадовця)

At Eurovision 2026 in Vienna, Moldova's jury awarded Ukraine zero points, and neighboring Romania only three. Meanwhile, ordinary Moldovan viewers gave Romania the maximum 12 points. The gap between "popular" and "expert" voting sparked a wave of outrage on social media and ultimately — a resignation at the highest level.

Who voted and how

Moldova's jury consisted of seven people: Andrei Zapsha (deputy general director of Teleradio-Moldova), Pavel Orlov, Stanislav Gonchar, Catalina Solomak, Corina Caireac, Ilona Stepan, and Victoria Kushnir. The composition was approved by TRM leadership. The jury awarded maximum 12 points to Poland — Ukraine and Romania ended up practically at the bottom of the seven experts' priority list. According to regulations, the jury assesses songs a day before the final — that is, before the live performance.

Margarita Druța, the host of Moldova's voting announcement, did not hide her shock. In a TikTok video, she admitted that after receiving the results, she "even considered refusing to go on air."

"The brotherly relations that the Republic of Moldova has with Romania, as well as our gratitude and respect for Ukraine for its daily sacrifices, are unchangeable. Our attitude toward Ukraine is not zero, and our feelings toward Romania can only be love."

Vlad Țurcanu, general director of Teleradio-Moldova, briefing May 18

Why resignation is a signal, not an apology

At the May 18 briefing, Țurcanu emphasized that the broadcaster's leadership did not influence the jury's decision, but the company and its head are responsible for the results. "I avoided giving instructions to jury members, and what happened is an extraordinary event. In our view, the jury did not take into account the sensitive moments between the Republic of Moldova and our neighbors," he explained. Țurcanu will submit his resignation statement to TRM's Supervisory Board.

Moldova's Culture Minister Cristian Gherdan publicly demanded official explanations for the gap between jury and television viewer voting. A deputy from the ruling PAS party also called for the broadcaster's leadership to resign even before Țurcanu announced it himself.

Context: Eurovision as a mirror of geopolitics

Russia and Belarus have been officially excluded from the competition. However, the scandal in Vienna showed: cultural influence does not require direct participation — seven people who assess songs a day before the final without public justification are enough. Eurovision 2026 was won by Bulgaria — Dara with the song Bangaranga scored 516 points, winning both in the jury and in televoting. Romania came third with 296 points, Ukraine — ninth.

  • Moldovan jury: Ukraine — 0 points, Romania — 3 points, Poland — 12 points
  • Moldovan television viewers: Romania — 12 points
  • Jury composition approved by TRM leadership, one member is deputy general director of the broadcaster

EBU regulations do not require juries to publicly explain their ratings — each member votes individually, and the aggregated result is announced without details. This very lack of transparency creates room for suspicion, even if facts of corruption have not been established.

If the EBU does not introduce mandatory public justification of jury ratings — especially in cases of sharp disagreements with televoting — Țurcanu's resignation will remain a gesture, not a reform.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026