Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"We're truly not ready": Denmark's top general on threats to Europe and implications for Ukraine

The Chief of the Danish General Staff warns of the risks of high-intensity warfare — why this is a signal not only for Brussels, but also for Kyiv and its partners.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 24, 2026 · 2 min read

"We're truly not ready": Denmark's top general on threats to Europe and implications for Ukraine
Міхаель Віггерс Хільдгаард (Фото: Sebastian Elias Uth / EPA)

In brief: a signal from Paris

At the Paris Defense Forum, Denmark’s Chief of the General Staff, General Mikael Viggers Hildgaard, said that European countries are "not truly ready" for high-intensity warfare, Politico reports. This assessment is not an emotional remark but a warning with concrete consequences for strategy and aid to Ukraine.

What the general said

"We need to change our thinking: from analysis to action. We are no longer very surprised, but we are also not truly ready"

— Mikael Viggers Hildgaard, Chief of the General Staff of Denmark (quote via Politico)

He emphasized that deterrence rests on combat power, reliable alliances, stockpiles, industrial capacity and logistics chains — and that effective deterrence works only when a potential aggressor judges the cost of attack to be too high.

Why this matters for Ukraine

Ukraine has given European militaries unique hands‑on experience of modern war. As expert Valentyn Badrak reminded readers on LIGA.net, it was Ukrainian experience that accelerated the rethinking of tactics, logistics and the use of UAVs in combat conditions. The current task is to scale these lessons up within European defense institutions — from stockpile policy to industrial mobilization.

Context: worrying signals from the Alliance

Recent episodes reinforce Hildgaard’s warning: German assessments increasingly point to the possibility of Russian aggression sooner than expected, and Lithuanian intelligence records force buildups near NATO borders. This means that questions of stockpiles, production and logistics capabilities are no longer "for the future" but for today.

Where the opportunity for Ukraine lies

There is also positive news: parts of European production chains are already integrating with Ukrainian initiatives — for example, Denmark is among the partners in joint UAV manufacturing in Europe. This is not just business: it is technological and operational cooperation that raises overall defense resilience.

What to do next

Analysts agree that three things must be accelerated — stockpiles (ammunition, fuel, spare parts), industrial capacity (rapid scaling within the EU and cooperation with Ukraine) and logistics (supply routes and equipment repair). For Ukraine this is an opportunity to turn combat experience into long‑term integration into European security chains.

"If we in Europe want to be able to defend ourselves by 2030, we have to prepare for it. High‑intensity war is not a scenario, it is a reality"

— Mikael Viggers Hildgaard (quote via Politico)

Conclusion

The Danish general’s words are not a call to panic but a roadmap: it is time to turn analysis into action. For Ukraine the key is to use its own experience as leverage to strengthen European defense readiness — while accelerating internal mobilization of industrial capabilities to make deterrence truly painful for any potential aggressor.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026