Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Drone use in the south has nearly doubled — what this means for front-line logistics

Southern Defense Forces spokesman Vladyslav Voloshyn reported a jump in the use of loitering UAVs from roughly 300 to 550 per day and a daily record of 156 guided aerial bombs. Why this matters for supply-chain security and how to respond — briefly and to the point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Drone use in the south has nearly doubled — what this means for front-line logistics
Російський військовий із дроном (Фото: ресурс окупантів)

What happened

The spokesman for the Southern Defense Forces, Vladyslav Voloshyn, told LIGA.net that the occupiers have significantly increased the use of drones on the southern front, in particular loitering munitions of the "Molniya-2" and "Lancet" types. According to him, the daily number of UAVs used has grown from about 300 to approximately 550.

"The number of UAVs used daily is increasing overall, and in particular the number of loitering munitions of the 'Molniya-2' and 'Lancet' types. Right now we are recording 550. If two or three weeks ago it was about 300, now it is already 550"

— Vladyslav Voloshyn, spokesman for the Southern Defense Forces

Why it matters

An increase in loitering munitions means not only more strikes but also a change in the enemy's tactics. According to Voloshyn, the goal is to expand the kill zone, increase the strike range and hit our forces' logistics routes. At the same time, there is a rise in air strikes: in one day — a record 156 guided aerial bombs (KAB) used, which complicates movement and resupply of forces.

What this means for defense

First, the enemy is trying to seize the initiative through attritional strikes on supply routes — it is a blow not only to equipment but to the ability to maneuver quickly. Second, this combination of loitering UAVs and massed air strikes increases the need for a comprehensive response: electronic countermeasures, strengthened air defense at key logistics nodes, dispersal of depots and changes to supply routes.

Analysts and military experts emphasize: this is not only about the number of strikes, but about the desire to create persistent kill zones — and to force us to spend resources on defense rather than on the offensive.

Context

Earlier LIGA.net already examined how robotic kill zones work and how much they cost. Reports from March 17–20 also noted an increase in the intensity of the enemy's offensive actions, and on March 19 Voloshyn said that Russia does not plan to reduce activity on the southern direction and is replenishing its losses.

Conclusion

The increased use of "Lancet" and "Molniya-2" and record daily KABs is a signal: the enemy is trying to minimize our operational capabilities by attacking logistics. Defense is not only air defense but also adapting supply chains, developing electronic countermeasures and changing tactics. Now the move is with our partners and with the decisions that will turn these statements into concrete protection measures and a strengthening of defense.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026