Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

On the eve of a massive attack: new air-defense missiles strengthen Ukraine's defenses

Russia launched tens of missiles and hundreds of drones — but shortly before, Ukraine received additional missiles for its air defenses. We examine how that affected the outcome and what it means for the security of cities and for diplomatic support.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

On the eve of a massive attack: new air-defense missiles strengthen Ukraine's defenses

Night attack: numbers and types of weapons

On the night of January 20 and in the morning, Russia launched a massive attack on Ukraine: according to official Air Force data — 34 missiles and 339 strike UAVs of various types.

Among the launches were the anti-ship Zircon missile, around 18 ballistic missiles of the Iskander‑M/S-300 type, 15 Kh-101 cruise missiles and hundreds of drones, including about 250 Shahed.

What changed thanks to the new missiles for air defense systems

The President links part of the success to the fact that Ukraine received additional missiles for air defense systems the day before. This expands interception capabilities at different ranges and allows more effective allocation of interceptors between systems.

"A day before this strike we finally received the necessary missiles, and that helped significantly. Every package of support matters. Missiles for the 'Patriots', for the 'NASAMS', for other air defense systems are critically needed."

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

In practical terms this means that complexes like Patriot and NASAMS received munitions that allow them to close critical gaps in the air defense area of responsibility — from high trajectories of ballistic missiles to low-flying drones.

Consequences for the population and infrastructure

Five missiles and 24 drones were recorded striking 11 locations; falling debris — at another 12 locations. In Kyiv one person was injured, the left bank was temporarily left without water supply, and more than 5,600 apartment buildings were without heating.

By region: one person killed in Kyiv region, two people wounded in Dnipro, and there are impacts in Odesa region, Vinnytsia, Poltava, Zaporizhzhia and other oblasts.

Why this matters and what's next

Receiving missiles on the eve of the strike did not eliminate the threat, but temporarily increased the chances for air defenses to shoot down critical targets and reduce destruction. Analysts and military experts emphasize: for this to become a lasting advantage, regular deliveries, personnel training and technical support from partners are required.

Diplomatic work remains key — supplies must be steady, not fragmented. Otherwise each subsequent wave of attacks could again put civilian infrastructure at risk.

Conclusion: the new missiles gave Ukrainian air defenses a critical reinforcement at the moment of the attack and reduced potential losses. But for long-term security a sustained pace and scale of support from partners is needed — a matter that concerns not only the military but millions of citizens.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026