Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Nobel laureate dedicates her prize to Trump — what it means for Latin America

María Corina Machado told Fox News in an interview that she wants to 'share' the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize with Donald Trump after the January 3 operation. We break down why this gesture matters not only for Venezuela — but also for regional security, energy, and international politics.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Nobel laureate dedicates her prize to Trump — what it means for Latin America

What happened

María Corina Machado, the leader of Venezuela's opposition, who in 2025 received the Nobel Peace Prize, said in an interview with Fox News that she would like to “share” the award with U.S. President Donald Trump. Machado directly linked her decision to a U.S. operation on January 3 that resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro — an event she called historic.

"I think he [Trump] has shown the whole world who he is. January 3 will go down in history as the day when justice defeated tyranny"

— María Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela's opposition, Nobel Peace Prize laureate (2025)

"This prize is the prize of the Venezuelan people… We would like to give it to him and share it with him"

— María Corina Machado, interview with Fox News

Why it matters

This gesture is not only an emotional acknowledgment. It serves several functions at once: it legitimizes external intervention in Venezuela's internal crisis, signals a possible shift in relations between Caracas and Washington, and opens a discussion about the future of regional security and energy. Political analysts note that symbolic moves often precede practical agreements — from security guarantees to foreign investment.

Possible consequences for the region

First, there is the possibility of faster integration of Venezuela into regional security alliances, which could change the balance of power in the Caribbean basin and South America. Second, if Caracas truly becomes an “energy hub,” it will attract investors but will require guarantees of the rule of law and protection for investments. Third, the return of millions of migrants will add domestic resources for recovery but will also pose challenges for economic and social reintegration.

What it means for Ukraine

For Ukraine, the principle itself is important: international political will and military-political actions can quickly change realities on the ground and create space for the restoration of state institutions. Given our interests, it is worth closely watching how international guarantees and investments are transformed into concrete decisions — from reconstruction to energy cooperation.

Conclusion

Machado's gesture is a powerful signal: symbolic actions can accelerate political change. The question now is whether these words will be turned into long-term agreements and investments that ensure stability and reconstruction. Demonstrative statements must be followed by practical steps; it will depend on those steps whether a free Venezuela embarks on a path of sustainable recovery.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026