Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

NYT: Cheap Shahed drones undermine the balance in the Persian Gulf — risks to shipping and lessons for Ukraine

Iran is producing hundreds of cheap drones that are forcing millions of dollars to be spent on interception. This is a strategic and economic problem for the region — and an opportunity for Ukrainian expertise.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 25, 2026 · 2 min read

NYT: Cheap Shahed drones undermine the balance in the Persian Gulf — risks to shipping and lessons for Ukraine
Дрон-Shahed (Фото: Aleksandr Gusev/Pacific Press picture alliance)

In high-stakes situations, it's not the shots but the numbers that count

The New York Times reports: Iran continues to make heavy use of cheap Shahed drones, and stopping their production is more difficult than U.S. officials had assumed. Even after strikes on factories, parts of the production chain can be rebuilt in small workshops using readily available components — so the problem cannot be solved by strikes on infrastructure alone.

What is happening in practice

Estimates suggest Tehran can launch up to 90 drones a day. They are easy to transport and conceal — launches can be carried out straight from pickups. Some of the devices are shot down by Gulf states, but the rest reach their targets and cause fatalities and infrastructure damage.

Economics versus technology: the logic of attrition

One reason for the Shahed's success is low production cost. One such drone costs about $35,000, while missiles and air-defense systems used to intercept them cost millions of dollars. This asymmetry allows the adversary to gradually deplete air-defense stocks and force partners to pay far more for defense than the attack costs.

"Global stocks of air-defense assets are virtually exhausted"

— Armin Papperger, chairman of the board of Rheinmetall (interview with CNBC)

Strategic dimension: the Strait of Hormuz and oil supplies

As long as Iran retains the capacity for mass launches, it has a tool to pressure the security of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz — a key route for global energy supplies. Disruption of this line would have consequences for world markets and for countries dependent on stable energy deliveries.

Lessons for Ukraine: experience, expertise, opportunity

Ukraine is already familiar with Shahed attacks: our air defenses have learned to operate more effectively against such systems. The president reported that 228 Ukrainian experts are simultaneously working in several Middle Eastern countries to counter mass attacks — an example of transferring combat experience and practical expertise.

At the same time, escalation in the Middle East opens both risks and opportunities: risks — from rising prices and the overstrain of global air-defense stocks; opportunities — for Ukraine's defense industry, which can offer tactical solutions, training programs, and repair capabilities.

Conclusion — what next?

The problem of cheap mass-produced drones is not only technical but strategic and economic. It requires a combination of measures: rapid deliveries of effective air-defense systems, logistical coordination and intelligence, and international cooperation that turns declarations into concrete contracts and deliveries. Whether partners can respond quickly enough to prevent this asymmetry from becoming the new norm is a key question for the region's security and for Ukraine's interests.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026