Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Newsom in Munich: Trump Not for Decades — What It Means for the West and Ukraine

At the Munich Security Conference, California Governor Gavin Newsom called the Trump administration temporary — we explain why this matters for European unity and for security support for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 15, 2026 · 2 min read

Newsom in Munich: Trump Not for Decades — What It Means for the West and Ukraine
Гевін Ньюсом (Фото: RONALD WITTEK / EPA)

What was discussed in Munich

At the Munich Security Conference (MSC) California Governor Gavin Newsom said the current administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is temporary and "will be measured in years, not decades," Bloomberg reports (14 February). Newsom linked that temporariness to expected losses by Republicans in the midterm elections and to possible legal limits on the president's powers, notably on tariffs.

"It will be measured in years, not decades"

— Gavin Newsom, governor of California

Key messages of the speech

Newsom distinguished the style of the current administration from enduring American institutions, urging European leaders to maintain stable partnerships not only with the U.S. federal government but also with powerful states like California. According to him, European capitals have become more cohesive in response to uncertainty in Washington.

"Perhaps that is Donald Trump's only contribution"

— Gavin Newsom, governor of California

Conservatives' stance and balance of interests

As reported, Senator Marco Rubio at the MSC also drew attention to a double message: Europe's fate is closely tied to the U.S., but there are questions about whether some European decisions align with Western values. Newsom partially agreed with the emphasis on the rule of law, but warned against concentrating power in a single set of hands.

Why this matters for Ukraine

This statement is more than domestic U.S. politics. First, the influence of the federal center on international policy can fluctuate, and in such periods states and subnational actors must take on an additional role in supporting partners. Second, likely legal and political constraints on the president regarding tariffs and external economic policy could affect supply chains and industrial projects important for defense cooperation.

For Ukraine this means: strengthening not only contacts with Washington, but also direct ties with U.S. states, investors and civil society; betting on multi-level support that can withstand fluctuations at the federal level.

Political background in the U.S.

Newsom is a prominent figure in the Democratic Party and a potential presidential contender in the future. His warnings combine a political assessment of risks for the U.S. with a call for Europeans to rely on a broader spectrum of American partners. This is part of a wider discussion about the stability of transatlantic relations during a period of political uncertainty.

Conclusion

Statements in Munich indicate two things: first, awareness is growing in North America and Europe of the short-term nature of certain political cycles; second, it is a signal to allies, including Ukraine, to activate multi-level diplomacy. The ball is now in the courts of European capitals and Kyiv — to turn rhetorical support into practical cooperation mechanisms that can withstand political changes in Washington.

Sources: Bloomberg, Munich Security Conference (MSC), speeches by Gavin Newsom and Marco Rubio.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026