Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Slugs' Paradise": How Russia's Slowdown on the Front Became an Argument for Allies

The pace of the Russian army's advance has fallen threefold over 18 months — and Latvia's foreign minister used this to urge partners to take more decisive action while Ukraine maintains the initiative.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 2 min read

"Slugs' Paradise": How Russia's Slowdown on the Front Became an Argument for Allies
Байба Браже (Фото: Valda Kalnina/EPA)

Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs of Latvia Baiba Braze at the Lennart Meri Conference in Tallinn on May 16 allowed herself unconventional rhetoric: "To say that the Russian army is advancing at the speed of a snail is an insult to snails." The phrase sounded not as a metaphor in a vacuum, but as a reference to specific figures and a specific request to allies.

What the figures show

Context comes from the ISW. According to analysts at the institute, the average pace of Russia's territorial captures has decreased at least two to three times compared to its peak: from over 14 sq. km per day in autumn 2024 to less than 3 sq. km in early 2026. In April 2026, Russia for the first time since August 2024 lost more territory than it captured: Ukraine reclaimed approximately 116 sq. km along several sections of the front, including in Sumy and Zaporizhzhia regions.

This is what Braze called "seizing the initiative" and drew a conclusion opposite to what one might expect from a diplomat: not "now we can weaken support," but "now is precisely the time to strengthen it."

Four directions — one message

In her conference speech, the minister outlined four priorities for strengthening European security:

  • building up Europe's military capabilities and defense industry;
  • expanding NATO presence on the eastern flank;
  • long-term support for Ukraine;
  • weakening Russia through sanctions and political pressure.

All four points are united by one logic: the window of opportunity is open now, while Russia is spending personnel and equipment significantly faster than it advances. In April, Kyiv reported over 35,000 enemy losses in a month — killed and seriously wounded.

The Baltic position in broader context

Braze's participation in the conference came immediately after the EU Council meeting on foreign affairs on May 11, where a 90 billion euro credit for Ukraine was approved and a 20th sanctions package against Russia was adopted. At that meeting, the Latvian minister personally emphasized the need to "continue and strengthen" support for Kyiv — in the presence of Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha.

"Support for Ukraine is an investment in European security"

Baiba Braze, EU Council on Foreign Affairs, May 11, 2026

In Tallinn, a tactical argument was added to this thesis: the pace that Braze called "an insult to snails" is not a reason for complacency, but precisely the condition under which pressure on Moscow is most effective.

What comes next

The ISW notes that the slowdown in Russia's advance is real — but also points out that the nature of hostilities has changed: Russia increasingly uses infiltration tactics instead of massed assaults, which complicates direct comparisons with previous years. The question is not whether the pace has really slowed — the data confirms it. The question is whether the allies can convert this moment into a systemic advantage: if the 20th sanctions package and a 90 billion euro credit really limit Russian defense industry financing by year's end, Braze's quip about snails will become not just a joke, but an accurate description of the Kremlin's strategic failure.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026