Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Pakistan Failed to Reach Agreement, Egypt and Turkey Making Phone Calls: Will They Make It by April 21

After 21 hours of negotiations in Islamabad, the USA and Iran parted ways without a deal. Now mediators are trying to narrow the gap before the ceasefire expires — in parallel with the announced naval blockade.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Pakistan Failed to Reach Agreement, Egypt and Turkey Making Phone Calls: Will They Make It by April 21
Дональд Трамп та Джей Ді Венс (фото: ЕРА)

A ceasefire between the USA and Iran is in effect until April 21. Negotiations in Islamabad lasted 21 hours and reached a deadlock. Now Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey are trying to resume dialogue before the deadline expires — and simultaneously, a naval blockade is beginning.

What halted negotiations in Islamabad

According to Axios citing American officials and regional sources, negotiations stalled on two key points. The first is the US demand to completely freeze uranium enrichment and transfer highly enriched uranium reserves. The second is the amount of frozen Iranian assets that Tehran wants to receive in exchange for nuclear concessions.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that the parties were "a step away from a deal" until the US "moved the goalposts." American officials and regional sources did not confirm this characterization, although they acknowledged progress was made.

"Both sides are bargaining. It's a bazaar."

— Axios source close to negotiations

Negotiations on the US side were led by Vice President JD Vance — meeting the Iranian delegation in person for the first time. The American official characterized the talks as "tough," but ones that "evolved into a friendly and productive exchange of proposals."

American red lines — and why Iran disagrees

According to ABC News, the American side set four non-negotiable conditions: complete cessation of uranium enrichment and dismantling of nuclear facilities; US right to confiscate existing highly enriched uranium; cessation of financing for Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis; and complete opening of the Strait of Hormuz without tariffs.

Iran has not signed on to any of these points. The IRGC stated that any military vessels approaching the strait "will be considered a violation of the ceasefire."

Blockade as leverage — and its limits

After the failed negotiations, Trump announced a naval blockade: US Central Command (CENTCOM) stated it will begin on Monday at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time and will apply to vessels of all countries entering or leaving Iranian ports.

According to CNBC citing the WSJ, Trump and his advisers are also considering resuming limited airstrikes on Iran — for additional pressure. In an interview with Fox News, Trump openly named targets: water supply facilities and power plants.

The White House's logic, according to an American official: the blockade should convince Iran of the reality of the American position — and force it to return to the table. However, there is no mechanism that would guarantee this step.

Mediators between two deadlines

On Sunday, Turkish and Egyptian foreign ministers conducted separate calls with their Pakistani counterpart. After that, both contacted Vitkoff and Araghchi — to keep the channels open for the next round.

The ceasefire hinges on one condition: the Strait of Hormuz remains open. It was precisely its opening in April that became the basis for the pause in bombardments. If the blockade provokes the strait to close — the ceasefire will de facto end before April 21.

The question is not whether the parties will sit down at the table before April 21. The question is whether the naval blockade can create pressure without escalation — or will it make the very deal it was declared for impossible.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026