Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Pashinyan Refused Putin Twice: Skipped Parade and Rejected Role as Ally

Armenia's Prime Minister publicly distances himself from Moscow on the war against Ukraine — amid the European Political Community summit in Yerevan and a month before parliamentary elections where neutrality carries concrete stakes.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Pashinyan Refused Putin Twice: Skipped Parade and Rejected Role as Ally
Нікол Пашинян на брифінгу 7 травня 2026 року (Фото: сайт прем'єр-міністра Вірменії)

On May 7, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made two statements that, individually, sound like diplomatic nuances, but together signal something clear: Yerevan is no longer silent about Ukraine.

What was said — and what wasn't

At a briefing following a government session, Pashinyan answered questions about Zelenskyy's recent visit to Yerevan. The response was brief:

"We sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and I have already said that on the Ukraine issue we are not allies of Russia".

Nikol Pashinyan, briefing May 7

He did not call Russia an aggressor, did not support sanctions, and did not announce a change in alliances. But in the context of a country that remains a member of the CSTO and hosts a Russian military base, even such a phrase represents a departure from previous ambiguity.

Regarding the May 9 parade — Pashinyan explained his absence by citing the election campaign: elections are scheduled for June 7, and the campaign officially starts May 8. However, this is the second consecutive year he has not appeared in Moscow — in 2024 he also did not attend, citing that he "had gone the year before".

Why now

On May 4, Yerevan hosted the VIII summit of the European Political Community — more than 30 leaders, NATO's secretary general, and Zelenskyy. For the latter, it was his first visit to Armenia since 2019 — and the first visit by a Ukrainian president to the country in 24 years.

Moscow's reaction was telling: a few days before the summit, Russia banned the import of Armenian mineral water. President Macron commented directly on the symbolism of the event: eight years ago, no one would have come here because many countries viewed Armenia as a "de facto satellite of Russia".

Context that is important not to miss:

  • In March 2025, the Armenian parliament passed a law initiating the process of EU accession.
  • Moscow responded by saying it "will not tolerate" Yerevan's rapprochement with the European Union.
  • On May 1, Pashinyan met with Putin in Moscow — and at the same time announced he would not attend the parade.
  • In the June 7 elections, blocs that, according to media reports, are supported by Russia are opposing Pashinyan's "Civil Contract" party.

The line between signal and commitment

Armenia remains a member of the Eurasian Economic Union. The Russian military base on Armenian soil has not disappeared anywhere. Humanitarian aid to Ukraine is real, but not military. Pashinyan says "we are not allies of Russia," but does not say "we support Ukraine".

This distinction is not a trifle. It is precisely what determines whether Pashinyan's statements represent the beginning of a new position or pre-election positioning for a domestic audience that is increasingly looking westward.

If after the June 7 elections Pashinyan's party retains its majority — the next real test will be the question: will Yerevan remove the Russian base or at least officially put this issue on the agenda of negotiations with the EU? Without this step, declarations about "non-alliance" will remain merely declarations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026