Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Perm Burns for the Second Time in Eight Days: What is "Lukoil-Permnefteorgsinhtez" and Why It's More Important Than Most Targets in Russia's Rear

SBU drones have struck one of Russia's largest oil refineries for the second time — a facility that processes 13 million tons of oil annually and supplies fuel to the Russian military. This is no random target 1,500 kilometers from Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 7, 2026 · 3 min read

Perm Burns for the Second Time in Eight Days: What is "Lukoil-Permnefteorgsinhtez" and Why It's More Important Than Most Targets in Russia's Rear
Удар по Пермі (Фото: Astra)

On May 7, explosions were heard again in Perm. Governor of Perm Krai Dmitry Makhonin confirmed a drone strike on "one of industrial enterprises" — the second attack on the same facility in eight days. According to OSINT data from the Telegram channel ASTRA, the target is the same: "Lukoil-Permnefteoргsintez" — a plant that ranks among Russia's top five oil refineries.

What exactly is burning and why this is not "another warehouse"

The plant's capacity is approximately 13 million tons of oil per year. For comparison: this is more than Poland's annual oil product consumption. The enterprise supplies fuel to both the civilian market of the Urals and, according to the SBU, the needs of the Russian army.

During the April 30 attack, a "Lyutiy" drone struck a vacuum column of the AVT-4 unit — a key node in primary oil refining. As confirmed by the OSINT channel CyberBoroshno, the fire spread to the atmospheric rectification column. Damage to both columns effectively puts the unit out of operation. At the same time, the Perm linear production dispatch station was attacked again, through which crude oil enters the plant — meaning the strike targeted the entire supply chain, not just a single point.

Chemical alert that authorities called "drills"

After the April 30 attack, residents of at least one Perm district heard a chemical hazard signal through public address systems ordering them not to go outside, to close windows and ventilation, and to drink only boiled water. Governor Makhonin denied any release of hazardous substances.

"They told us not to go outside, to close all windows and ventilation, and to drink only boiled water"

— a local Perm resident in a comment to Ostorozhno Media

The official version: the signal was planned drills that coincidentally coincided with the drone strike on the industrial facility.

1,500 km — and this is principled

Perm is located in the Urals — over 1,500 kilometers from the Ukrainian border. This is farther than most targets mentioned in reports. The SBU directly pointed to the strategic message of the operation:

"The enemy must understand one simple thing: they no longer have a safe rear. Distance no longer guarantees protection"

— Security Service of Ukraine, official statement following the April 30 strike

Reuters previously documented that Ukraine is systematically increasing strikes on Russian energy infrastructure, reducing export capacity and complicating Moscow's ability to use oil revenues to finance the war. According to the Kyiv Independent, monopoly "Transneft," which controls over 80% of Russian crude oil transportation, has already warned producers about possible production cuts due to a series of drone attacks.

Repeated strike — tactic, not coincidence

Two strikes on the same facility in eight days — not a navigation error. The first strike on April 29–30 stopped the AVT-4 unit and damaged pipeline infrastructure. The repeated attack on May 7, when the plant had not yet resumed operations, is either an attempt to cement the unit's shutdown or reconnaissance by fire: to check what exactly was restored in a week and where vulnerabilities remain.

After both attacks, Makhonin reported: no casualties, the "drone threat" regime continues, the operational headquarters is working. What the plant is actually producing at this time — is not specified.

If the AVT-4 unit is indeed out of operation for an extended period, the question is not whether the Urals region will feel it — but when the Russian army encounters a specific fuel shortage in specific front-line sectors and whether this will be noticeable before Moscow finds a logistics alternative.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026