Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

First stage of the prisoner exchange: 200 defenders returned from Russian captivity — what it means

Two hundred of our service members have returned home under the agreements reached in Geneva. We explain who returned, how the exchange was carried out, and what the consequences are for further negotiations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 5, 2026 · 2 min read

First stage of the prisoner exchange: 200 defenders returned from Russian captivity — what it means
Фото: Telegram / V_Zelenskiy_official

What happened

According to the Office of the President, Ukraine has returned another 200 prisoners of war from Russian captivity. The information is confirmed by President Volodymyr Zelensky; the head of the Office of the President, Kyrylo Budanov, described this as the first stage of the exchange agreed during talks in Geneva.

Who returned

Among the released are defenders from Mariupol, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia. They include servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the State Special Transport Service, border guards and National Guard personnel. For families and for the army this is not just a number: each person matters for combat capability and public morale.

How the exchange took place

According to the Office of the President's leadership, the agreement on this stage was reached during diplomatic consultations in Geneva. In their statements, officials noted the role of international partners in mediating the negotiations.

"This is the first stage of the exchange that was agreed during the talks in Geneva."

— Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Office of the President

"Another 200 of our defenders have returned home — this is the result of systematic work by diplomats and security services."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Diplomatic context and consequences

The exchange is not only a humanitarian act but also a marker of negotiating progress. It boosts morale in society and provides an additional argument in talks with partners: when there are concrete agreements, it is easier to shape subsequent steps. The country's leadership thanked international partners for facilitating this operation, highlighting the role of external diplomacy in protecting citizens' interests.

What’s next

This is only the first stage — the next key task for Kyiv and its partners is to consolidate the agreements, resume subsequent stages of exchanges and establish transparent mechanisms and lists to minimize delays. For society, the main measure of success is not headlines but the people who have returned.

Summary: the exchange returned 200 defenders and opened the way for continued negotiations. The next step is to turn diplomatic progress into lasting mechanisms for freeing all those still in captivity.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026