Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Under a false name: Umerov warned about fake appeals to diplomats — what this means for Ukraine's security

Unknown individuals are posing as the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) and contacting international partners. This is not simply fraud — it undermines the trust on which operational ties and security depend.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 25, 2026 · 1 min read

Under a false name: Umerov warned about fake appeals to diplomats — what this means for Ukraine's security
Рустем Умєров (Фото: Olivier Matthys/EPA)

What happened

On March 25, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Rustem Umerov reported on Telegram about cases in which unknown individuals are impersonating him and contacting diplomats and partners requesting information.

"These messages have nothing to do with me or my official activities."

— Rustem Umerov, Secretary of the NSDC

Why it matters

It may seem like a small thing — "just another" fake. But for diplomatic and military communications it's a direct threat: undermining trust in the chain of information transfer makes procedures through which intelligence, logistics, and coordination with partners pass vulnerable.

Context: technologies and precedents

According to reports by LIGA.net and expert columns, today artificial intelligence greatly simplifies creating authentic-seeming forgeries of voice and text — from deepfake videos to fabricated chats. This is not a theoretical risk: in 2025 Russian Telegram channels spread a deepfake of Olha Stefanishyna, and in 2022 pranksters attempted to call the leadership of Baykar Defence using voice-spoofing technologies.

"Artificial intelligence is actively used by both criminals and defenders — this creates new threats and challenges in cybersecurity."

— Serhii Korsunskyi, diplomat (comment in a LIGA.net column)

What to do now

The NSDC has already urged verifying communication sources and reporting suspicious requests to the Office of the NSDC of Ukraine. Practical steps for diplomats, volunteers, and civil servants:

  • Confirm identity through official channels — do not respond to unverified messages.
  • Do not transmit confidential information by email or messengers without additional authentication.
  • Report suspicious contacts to the Office of the NSDC and your institution's IT services.

Conclusion

This incident is an example of how asymmetric tools (deepfake, impersonation) work to undermine trust. Protecting communications is not only about technology, but about procedures and a culture of security. While state and private entities adapt protective tools, the responsibility for preserving channels of trust rests with everyone who communicates with international partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026