Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

After drone strikes on Nakhchivan, Aliyev condemned the attack — Baku will not join operations against Iran

The President of Azerbaijan called the attack "cowardly" and will demand explanations from Tehran. Why this matters for regional stability and what it means for Ukraine — briefly and to the point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 5, 2026 · 2 min read

After drone strikes on Nakhchivan, Aliyev condemned the attack — Baku will not join operations against Iran
Фотог: azertag.az

Why it matters

For the first time Iran attacked Nakhchivan with drones — an incident with potential implications for the security of the South Caucasus. Statements by President Ilham Aliyev and the mobilization of army units indicate that Baku is responding firmly on the political level, but restrained in operational terms. For Ukraine this is another signal of growing regional instability and that threats from Tehran can take on a transregional character.

What happened

According to the Azerbaijani state agency AZERTAJ, at around noon on March 5 Iran used unmanned aerial vehicles against targets in Nakhchivan for the first time — hitting the airport terminal, a school and infrastructure. The Iranian ambassador was summoned to the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, and Tehran will be issued a strong protest.

Baku's position

Aliyev sharply condemned the strike, but at the same time confirmed that Azerbaijan does not intend to broaden the conflict by conducting operations against Iran. He emphasized readiness to defend territorial integrity and ordered forces to be placed on heightened alert.

"Iranian officials must provide explanations, apologize to the Azerbaijani side, and those who carried out this terrorist act must be held criminally accountable"

— Ilham Aliyev, President of Azerbaijan

Aliyev also recalled that earlier Baku had expressed condolences to Iran in connection with recent events in the region, and pointed to humanitarian assistance — in particular, the evacuation of Iranian diplomats at Tehran's request.

Kyiv's reaction and the international dimension

Ukrainian diplomacy condemned the attack and called for a consolidation of efforts to neutralize threats emanating from the regime in Tehran. Kyiv's statements underscore that for Ukraine this is not only solidarity with a neighbor but also a matter of its own security in a broader geopolitical context.

"Iran's attack on Azerbaijan once again demonstrates that the regime in Tehran constitutes a global, not a regional, threat"

— Andriy Sybiha, representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine

What it means going forward

In short: Baku is choosing a combination of political toughness and operational restraint — this reduces the risk of immediate escalation, but does not remove concern. The mobilization of units and diplomatic protest notes put pressure on Tehran while leaving room for further incidents. For Ukraine it is important to monitor developments: any additional destabilization in the Caucasus will complicate the security environment and may require coordination with partners.

Analysts note that the key now is how regional and global players will react. Declarations must turn into concrete deterrence mechanisms, and much will depend on whether the incident remains an isolated flare-up or develops into a longer-term crisis.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026