Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Essentially a bureaucracy": Podoliak rewrites Yermak's role — while he, according to UP, still controls appointees

Presidential Office adviser Mykhailo Podolyak called the Office of the President a secretariat without executive functions, and Yermak a manager without his own political weight. This contradicts what sources at Ukrainska Pravda report: five months after his resignation, the former head of the Presidential Office maintains decisive influence over most key appointments.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 23, 2026 · 3 min read

"Essentially a bureaucracy": Podoliak rewrites Yermak's role — while he, according to UP, still controls appointees
Володимир Зеленський та Андрій Єрмак (Фото: ALESSANDRO DELLA VALLE / EPA)

What Podolyak Said — And Why Right Now

In a video for LIGA.net, advisor to the Presidential Office Mykhaylo Podolyak laid out a version that is meant to become the official narrative following Andriy Yermak's resignation: the Presidential Office is not an executive body, but "essentially the president's chancellery, secretariat." Yermak, according to Podolyak, was an operations manager, not an independent political figure.

The timeline is crucial. Yermak was dismissed on November 28, 2025 — the same morning that the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office conducted searches at his residence as part of Operation "Midas" regarding large-scale corruption in the energy sector. Zelensky announced a "reboot" of the Presidential Office, and appointed a new head — Kyrylo Budanov — only on January 2, 2026, after more than a month of interregnum.

Podolyak's words appear now — at the height of discussions about whether anything has really changed. And this is not neutral analysis: this is positioning.

The Bankova Version Against Sources' Version

The thesis that "Yermak was just a manager" falls apart on its own logic. If the Presidential Office is a chancellery without real influence, why would it be publicly announced as undergoing a reboot after the resignation of just one "operations manager"?

"Yermak is gone — but he exists. It's just that now he needs to send not 10 text messages, but 5. And everything else will be controlled by trusted people."

Source of Ukrainian Pravda in the power vertical, April 2026

According to Ukrainian Pravda, nearly five months after Yermak's resignation, he retains decisive influence over most appointees who appeared in the Presidential Office during his tenure. Key figures have remained in place. Sources of the publication in political circles note: there was no signal from the president to "stop answering the phone" — instead, there is a signal that confirms Andriy Borisovych's authority.

An even more telling detail: according to those same sources, the new head of the Presidential Office Budanov does not have real personnel independence regarding the deputies left by Yermak.

Podolyak's Interest in This Picture

Podolyak is not a neutral commentator. After all of Yermak's advisors were dismissed, he was reappointed as an advisor to the Presidential Office itself. He remained in the system he describes as "merely a chancellery."

  • Minimizing Yermak removes institutional responsibility from the Presidential Office for decisions made between 2019–2025.
  • The "secretariat" frame protects Zelensky: if the Presidential Office is a technical body, all power and all responsibility rests exclusively with the president.
  • The timing of the statement coincides with National Anti-Corruption Bureau investigations and public discussions about how the "reboot" turned out to be cosmetic.

What a Skeptic Should Do With This

Podolyak is not lying in the sense that the Presidential Office is indeed not formally an executive body — this is enshrined in law. But "formally" and "factually" in Ukrainian politics diverged long ago. For five years, the Presidential Office made decisions that determined personnel policy in ministries, negotiating positions, and the media agenda. Now, when searches have already been conducted and Yermak is out of office, the concept of a "chancellery" suddenly emerges.

If Budanov truly cannot independently replace any of the deputies left by his predecessor — then the question is not whether Yermak was an influential figure. The question is whether he remains one. And the answer to that will not come from Podolyak's words, but when — or if — the National Anti-Corruption Bureau announces charges.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026