Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Port attacks double in 2025: 90 strikes — what this means for exports and security

In 2025 Russia doubled the intensity of missile-and-drone strikes on Ukrainian ports — 90 combined attacks were recorded. We explain why this matters for logistics, jobs, and national security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 28, 2025 · 2 min read

Port attacks double in 2025: 90 strikes — what this means for exports and security

In Brief

According to Vice Prime Minister Oleksii Kuleba, in 2025 the intensity of Russian strikes on Ukrainian ports doubled — 90 combined attacks were recorded over the year. This is a direct hit on export chains that remain critical for the state budget and global food security.

'Russia has intensified missile‑drone attacks on Ukrainian ports, trying to destroy logistics and exports.'

— Oleksii Kuleba, Vice Prime Minister for the Restoration of Ukraine — Minister for Communities and Territories Development

What happened and where the greatest threat is

The most difficult situation remains in the south: in Odesa Oblast there have been almost 800 air raid alerts since the beginning of the year, with a combined duration of more than 30 days. Despite this, port logistics continue to operate — ensured by hundreds of port workers and related‑sector employees who go on shift every day under the threat of strikes.

The attacks have caused human casualties and environmental consequences: on Christmas night, an attack on port and industrial infrastructure in Odesa Oblast killed one person and injured two others. In the night of December 22, more than 30 storage containers with flour and oil caught fire in one of the largest ports. Oil slicks and dead birds were found in the area of the 'Delfin' and 'Lanzheron' beaches.

Why this matters — explanation

Ports are not just infrastructure; they are channels through which the country receives foreign currency revenues, exports agricultural products and supports industrial supply chains. The systematic strikes are aimed specifically at complicating logistics, raising transportation costs and creating imbalances in supplies.

Analysts and international partners point out that maintaining exports under fire will require not only the restoration of facilities but also strengthening air defence around port areas, investing in protected infrastructure and rapid coordination between services.

What is being done and what comes next

Ukraine is already strengthening port protection: together with the Maritime Ports Authority and with partner support, more than 50 mobile shelters have been installed in the ports of Odesa and Mykolaiv regions; the number of permanent shelters exceeds 30. Systematic work to enhance protection is carried out daily together with the Defence Forces and international partners.

Summary: ports are coping thanks to human effort and rapid measures, but risks are increasing. Additional technical solutions and sustained investments in the defence of infrastructure are needed to preserve export capability and minimize economic losses.

Conclusion

The figures — 90 strikes and a doubling of intensity — indicate not only an increase in combat activity but a deliberate attempt to weaken Ukraine's economic capacity. The question now for partners and the market is whether support will turn into systemic solutions — air defence, infrastructure investments and the restoration of logistics routes — to reduce the vulnerability of key maritime arteries?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026