Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Poland prepares lawsuit against Russia over Soviet-era crimes — a test for Europe and a precedent for Ukraine

The Financial Times reports that Warsaw is launching a large-scale investigation into Soviet crimes after demands made to Germany (€1.3 trillion). We examine why this is happening now and what consequences it could have for regional security and historical justice.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Poland prepares lawsuit against Russia over Soviet-era crimes — a test for Europe and a precedent for Ukraine
Фото: Tomasz Gzell / EPA

What it’s about

Financial Times writes that Poland is preparing a legal case against Russia for crimes committed during Soviet rule — a move that echoes the demand to Germany for €1.3 trillion in reparations for World War II. This is not an emotional gesture: at the instruction of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, the Institute of War Losses has launched an investigation intended to establish the scale and cost of the Soviet occupation.

"This investigation will be much more extensive than the work on the report about Nazi brutality."

— Bartosz Gondek, director of the Institute of War Losses

Why this is happening now

The explanation is simple and at the same time complex: first, there are fewer witnesses of Soviet repressions — time is working against memory. Second, the political context: after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, interest across Europe in restoring the historical account of Soviet crimes has increased. Third, Poland’s policy and the government’s focus have shifted toward issues of justice and reparations.

"Poland is at the beginning of the path of establishing Soviet crimes and faces the last chance to collect testimonies from people who lived through the Soviet decades."

— Jakub Stefaniak, deputy head of the Prime Minister's Office

Legal and practical barriers

The project will face real problems: lack of access to Russian archives, documents that have been destroyed or falsified, and the difficulty of quantitatively assessing long-term economic and demographic losses. Gondek himself acknowledges that the case will be long-term — this is not a press exercise, but years and decades of work.

Parallels with the German case are important: Berlin rejected official claims, citing post-war agreements, but at the same time individual measures by German authorities — memorials, the return of artifacts — show that questions of memory and restoring justice can be addressed outside legal instruments.

What this means for Ukraine

For Ukraine, Warsaw’s initiative has several dimensions. First, it is a question of historical truth: holding Russia accountable for systemic crimes bolsters the international narrative and legal basis for holding the aggressor responsible. Second, it is a potential precedent for recovering compensation from identified aggressor states, which could be relevant to Ukrainian plans for reparations.

Third, such a move will have geopolitical consequences: Moscow will undoubtedly react, risking an escalation of tensions in relations. For Ukraine, this means that questions of legal accountability will be accompanied by demands for increased diplomatic and security support from partners.

Brief outlook

This is a long process with many uncertainties: gathering evidence, legal battles, political pressure. But Poland’s determination to launch such an investigation matters — it changes the terms of the debate about responsibility for historical crimes in Europe. For the Ukrainian reader the main point is this: issues of justice and security are closely linked, and international precedents can work toward our common goal — holding the aggressor accountable and restoring justice.

Summary: Warsaw’s initiative is not only a story about compensation. It is a political and legal challenge to Moscow, a signal to Europe, and a potential tool for strengthening international accountability for aggression. Whether other states will follow Poland’s example is a question whose answer will depend on political will, access to evidence, and the patience of legal systems.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026