Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

More than 1,000 Kenyans recruited to fight in the war against Ukraine — how the scheme works and why it matters

The Kenyan parliament and Le Monde report on large-scale recruitment through tourist visas and recruitment agencies. We examine which routes were used, who is behind it, and what the consequences are for Ukraine and Africa.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 19, 2026 · 2 min read

More than 1,000 Kenyans recruited to fight in the war against Ukraine — how the scheme works and why it matters
Кенія (Ілюстративне фото: Daniel Irungu/EPA)

What is known

According to Kenyan Member of Parliament Kimani Ichungwah, who worked on a joint intelligence and Criminal Investigations Directorate report and is cited by Le Monde, to date more than 1,000 Kenyan citizens have been recruited and sent to fight on Russia's side in the war against Ukraine. Earlier estimates spoke of several hundred — now the figures are significantly higher, and this has implications for security and diplomacy in the region.

"To date more than 1,000 Kenyans have been recruited and sent to fight in the Russo‑Ukrainian war"

— Kimani Ichungwah, Member of Parliament of Kenya

How the scheme worked

Recruiters used tourist visas and transit routes through Istanbul and Abu Dhabi, and — to avoid checks — through Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Africa. Some Kenyans traveled to Russia directly from the countries where they were working. According to the report, recruitment agencies in Nairobi enlisted people by promising pay from €920 to €2,400 per month, and to ensure the flows they relied on corrupt connections at the airport and, according to the MP, embassy staff.

Scale of losses and repatriations

According to Ichungwah: 28 people are missing, 35 are in camps or on military bases, 89 are on the front line, 39 are hospitalized, and 30 have already been repatriated. Separately, Ukraine's Main Intelligence Directorate reported an incident: on 31 January 2026 a mercenary from Kenya (born 1997) was killed in Donetsk region. These figures indicate not only the scale of recruitment but also the real human losses and risks for Kenyan citizens.

Government response and international implications

The Kenyan government has already condemned the use of its citizens as "cannon fodder"; Foreign Minister Musalia Mudavadi plans to visit Moscow next month. This diplomatic mobilization signals Nairobi's aim not only to bring citizens home but also to compel the partner to explain the recruitment channels. For Ukraine, this is another example of how Russia seeks external resources to bolster its military potential.

What this means and what's next

First, the scheme shows organization: the use of tourist visas, networks of recruitment agencies and corrupt officials points to a systemic approach. Second, it is an information‑legal challenge: Kenya and international partners will have grounds to demand transparency from transit countries and to hold intermediaries accountable. Finally, for Ukraine such cases strengthen the arguments for the need to control mercenaries and to monitor external channels used to replenish the adversary's forces.

Going forward, watch two things: whether Kenya will obtain explanations from Russia and secure the return of its citizens, and whether this will lead to tighter control over transit routes and a crackdown on recruitment agencies. For the reader this is a security issue — not only for Ukraine but also for the regions from which these flows originate: will visa and labor mechanisms be tightened to close off similar schemes?

Sources: Le Monde (based on a Kenyan parliamentary report), statement by MP Kimani Ichungwah, public reports from Ukraine's Main Intelligence Directorate regarding incidents of mercenary participation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026