Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Intermediary in Pretrial Detention, Bosses at Large: What the Arithmetic of Bail Says in the "Porn Offices" Case

Four regional police chiefs paid over 18 million hryvnia in bail and were released. The deputy minister's driver — the person who personally received cash and shuttled between pornography studios and police offices — remains behind bars because he cannot afford bail.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 3 min read

Intermediary in Pretrial Detention, Bosses at Large: What the Arithmetic of Bail Says in the "Porn Offices" Case
Приміщення Офісу Генерального прокурора (Фото: ОГП)

On May 20, 2026, the SBU jointly with the Office of the Prosecutor General conducted searches simultaneously in three regional departments of the National Police — in Ivano-Frankivsk, Ternopil, and Zhytomyr regions. Within days, the court imposed preventive measures on five suspects. Currently, four of them are already at home.

How the scheme worked

According to the investigation, heads of regional police received a monthly "subscription fee" of 20 thousand dollars — for guaranteed inaction: not to respond to complaints, not to record violations, to warn in advance about inspections. Another 5 thousand dollars per month was received by the intermediary.

The intermediary role was performed by a driver of the motor pool of the State Institution "Service Center for Ministry of Internal Affairs Departments" — a unit subordinate to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. As reported by Ukrainska Pravda, in February 2026 he received 45 thousand dollars, in April — another 25 thousand. It was during the next "tranche" that he was detained.

"The intermediary in the scheme was a driver of one of the deputies of the Minister of Internal Affairs. He used connections among the leadership of the National Police and negotiated with officials about silence surrounding pornographic studios".

Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko

To avoid leaving traces, scheme participants communicated through messengers using conditional designations, and discussed key details exclusively in person.

Who was released — and for how much

On May 21, the court chose a preventive measure in the form of detention with the alternative of bail. The bail amounts are indicative in themselves:

  • Head of the Main Police Department in Ivano-Frankivsk region — 7 million hrn (paid)
  • Deputy head of the Main Police Department in Ivano-Frankivsk region — 5 million hrn (paid)
  • First deputy head of the investigative department of the Main Police Department in Ternopil region — 5 million hrn (paid)
  • Deputy head of the Main Police Department in Zhytomyr region — 1 million 164 thousand hrn (paid)
  • Driver of the State Institution "Service Center for Ministry of Internal Affairs Departments" — 8 million hrn (not paid, remains in custody)

This logic appears paradoxical: the driver — the person who according to the investigation was detained directly while receiving a bribe — was assigned by the court the highest bail of all five. Meanwhile, four heads of regional departments, who are charged with systemic corruption over months, found the necessary amounts and were released.

During searches, investigators seized six luxury cars, five Swiss watches, firearms, and cash. The total sum of seized funds, according to the Office of the Prosecutor General, amounts to 22.6 million hrn — more than the combined bail of all five.

What remains off the record

The investigation has not yet publicly named the surname of the deputy minister of internal affairs whose driver served as the intermediary. The National Police launched internal inspections in three regions, but their scope and timeline have not been officially announced. According to the Prosecutor General's Office, investigators are "establishing the full circle of persons" — which directly indicates that the current five suspects are likely not the final list.

If internal investigations by the National Police reveal those involved in these three regions, but the case does not reach the level of the central Ministry of Internal Affairs apparatus — that in itself would be an answer to the question about the real scope of the investigation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026