Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Fire in Crans-Montana: identifying victims may take several days — what is known

Reuters: about 40 killed and 115 injured; experts will use dental and DNA samples, and authorities consider an accident the most likely explanation.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 2, 2026 · 2 min read

Fire in Crans-Montana: identifying victims may take several days — what is known

Briefly

According to Reuters, a nighttime fire in an overcrowded bar at the Crans‑Montana ski resort killed about 40 people and injured roughly 115 more. Because of severe burns and the condition of the bodies, the identification process will stretch over several days — experts are working with dental samples and DNA.

"The first task is to establish the names of all the bodies found"

— Nicolas Féro, mayor of Crans‑Montana

How identification will proceed

Local authorities say that in many cases usual methods of identification (documents, recognition by relatives) are unsuitable due to the extent of the damage. Therefore dental records and DNA analysis are being used — this is standard international practice and takes time: biological materials must be matched with existing databases or relatives' samples.

"All this work must be done because the information is so delicate that nothing can be reported to families until we are 100% certain"

— Matthias Reynard, head of the government of the canton of Valais

Possible cause and consequences

Swiss authorities are currently leaning toward an accident rather than an intentional attack. Eyewitnesses and videos on social media suggest the fire may have started because of candles placed near the ceiling of the basement area. The investigation will continue, and final conclusions will depend on the results of technical examinations.

This tragedy is a reminder of the risks in crowded venues, especially during holidays: building materials, evacuation routes, and control of open flames must be priorities for venue owners and local regulators.

What matters for Ukrainian readers

Foreign embassies are checking whether their citizens are among the victims. Ukrainians who have relatives or friends in the region are advised to monitor official statements from local authorities and consular services — only they provide confirmed information about identification and assistance.

Conclusion

While identification and the investigation continue, the priorities are patience for the families and accountability from the authorities: will this tragedy lead to tougher fire-safety rules in night venues? The answer will determine how much similar risks can be reduced in the future.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026