Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Sakharov Prize: European Parliament honours jailed journalists from Belarus and Georgia — a test of European solidarity

Andrzej Poczobut and Mzia Amaglobeli received the Sakharov Prize, although both are behind bars. The ceremony was not only recognition but also the EU’s signal about the need for concrete action against repression in the region.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

Sakharov Prize: European Parliament honours jailed journalists from Belarus and Georgia — a test of European solidarity

Sakharov Prize 2025: what happened and why it matters

The European Parliament awarded the Andrei Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought to this year’s laureates — the Belarusian journalist Andrzej Poczobut and the Georgian media professional Mzia Amaglobeli. Since both are behind bars, their representatives received the awards. The information was published by the European Parliament; the reports were also circulated by Ukrainian news agencies, including UNN.

Quotes that speak for themselves

We did not choose this path, but every day we choose hope and the belief that truth and human dignity still matter. Since he cannot be here today, I hope he somehow knows: he has not been forgotten

— Yana Poczobut, daughter of Andrzej Poczobut

I accept this award on behalf of my fellow journalists who are fighting in Georgia today to save journalism as such. They work tirelessly so that you hear the voice of civil resistance in Georgia and so that the truth is not drowned out

— Mzia Amaglobeli (statement read by Irma Dimitradze)

Facts not to miss

Andrzej Poczobut was sentenced in Belarus to 8 years in a penal colony; he has been imprisoned since 2023, and was recently not included on the pardon lists. Mzia Amaglobeli, the founder of independent outlets, was sentenced in August 2025 to two years' imprisonment for allegedly "resisting the police" during an action that involved the use of stickers.

The context is broader: according to monitoring, in Georgia from May 2024 to 2 May 2025 there were 342 recorded cases of violations of journalists' rights. In Belarus, as early as March 2021 the Prosecutor General's Office opened cases against representatives of the Union of Poles, among them Andrzej Poczobut and other activists.

Europe’s stance and the practical meaning of the award

The Sakharov Prize is not only a symbol. As the EU's leading human rights award, it serves as a public marker of attention to specific cases of persecution. Awarding the prize to imprisoned journalists signals that the issue of freedom of expression remains on the European Parliament's agenda and requires not only declarations but concrete measures — from sanctions to support for independent media and legal assistance.

What it means for the region and for Ukraine

This ceremony is part of broader pressure on authoritarian practices in neighboring countries. For Ukraine, it is important that the EU maintains attention to freedom of expression in the region: this strengthens arguments in favor of international support for Ukrainian media, the protection of investigative journalism formats, and assistance programs for political prisoners and their families.

Conclusion: from symbol to action

The awarding of the Sakharov Prize to Andrzej Poczobut and Mzia Amaglobeli is a clear gesture of solidarity. The next step is up to partners: to translate symbolic support into concrete instruments of pressure and assistance — otherwise there is a risk that important messages will remain only on paper. Whether Europe is ready to reinforce this signal with practical steps is a question whose answer will determine the effectiveness of protecting freedom of expression in the region.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026