Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Putin wants peace in 2025 — but only the kind where he keeps Donbas. Peskov says: there are no deadlines

Bloomberg, citing an anonymous source, reports: Putin seeks to end the war this year, but only on the condition of full control over Donbas and Europe's recognition of Moscow's territorial gains. The Kremlin immediately distanced itself from any timelines.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 3 min read

Putin wants peace in 2025 — but only the kind where he keeps Donbas. Peskov says: there are no deadlines
Володимир Путін (Фото: ЕРА)

Putin wants peace — but not just any peace. According to Bloomberg, citing an anonymous source familiar with Kremlin sentiment, the Russian dictator aims to end the war against Ukraine by the end of 2025. The condition: full control over Donbas and an agreement with Europe that would effectively legalize all territories captured since 2022.

Moscow's official reaction came almost immediately. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that Putin set no deadline and called any predictions about negotiation timelines "a big mistake." This discrepancy between the anonymous signal and public denial is nothing new: this is how the Kremlin traditionally probes partners' reactions without committing to anything.

What Putin is actually negotiating for

The full picture is more complex than a simple desire for "peace." Besides Donbas, according to Bloomberg, Putin is seeking a broad agreement with Europe on security architecture — essentially Russia's reintegration into the Western economic and diplomatic space. Simultaneously, he rejects any compromises on the conditions insisted upon by Kyiv and Brussels.

"He wants a broad conversation about Russia's reintegration with the West, commercial deals with the United States — and to do it long and tediously while continuing to bomb Ukraine's energy infrastructure and slowly advance on the battlefield"

Amos Hochstein, former Biden adviser, CNBC

This assessment aligns with Moscow's behavior at negotiations: a five-hour meeting between Putin and Trump's special envoys — Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner — in December ended with Ushakov calling it "constructive" but "requiring further work." No breakthrough was achieved.

Where exactly the conflict stands

Donbas is not abstract. According to CBS News, negotiations remain deadlocked precisely over Donetsk region: Russia demands full control, while roughly one-fifth of the region, including the fortress cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, remains under Ukrainian control. Zelenskyy confirmed to Euronews that Kyiv and Washington have reached agreement on most points of the peace plan — except Donbas and the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.

Ukraine's position on this point is constitutional: Kyiv cannot legally agree to territorial transfers. Zelenskyy also insists on the presence of international forces on the contact line — since, in his words, trusting Moscow's promises after 2014 is impossible.

  • Russia controls roughly one-fifth of Ukraine, but not all of the declared Donbas
  • Peskov admitted that the goals of the "SVO" have not been fully achieved — which is why the operation continues
  • Rubio publicly questioned whether Putin wants a deal at all or plans to "seize the entire country" — this was a signal to Kyiv and Brussels
  • The Kremlin rejected Berlin's proposal for a Christmas ceasefire, claiming that a pause would only allow Ukraine to regroup

Why the signal emerged now

The leak about "desire for peace" benefits Moscow in several dimensions simultaneously: it eases pressure from Trump, who publicly promised to stop the war, and gives Putin the image of a negotiator — without real concessions. According to Bloomberg analysts' assessment, Russia's advance has slowed on the battlefield, and economic pressure within the country is mounting: Putin's approval ratings are falling, even if his political position remains stable.

Meanwhile, Europe is not staying on the sidelines. In October, it became known that the EU and Kyiv are jointly developing a 12-point peace plan along the current front line — directly contrary to Putin's demand to recognize captured territories. The plan provides for an oversight board chaired by Trump.

If Moscow truly has an internal deadline by the end of 2025 but publicly denies it, the key question is not whether Putin wants peace — but at what price the US and Europe are willing for him to stop: one where Slovyansk becomes Russian, or one where the current front line is fixed without annexation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026