Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Five-step EU plan: how Brussels could grant Ukraine partial membership as early as 2027

Politico outlines a plan that proposes "partial membership" for Ukraine — a political maneuver against Moscow and against Budapest's veto. Why this matters for security and what risks lie ahead in 2027.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 3 min read

Five-step EU plan: how Brussels could grant Ukraine partial membership as early as 2027
Урсула фон дер Ляєн та Володимир Зеленський (Фото: EPA)

In high diplomacy, quiet agreements matter more than loud statements

Politico writes that the European Union is developing an "unprecedented" five-step plan that could grant Ukraine partial membership as early as 2027. Sources for the outlet — five unnamed diplomats, three EU officials and two Ukrainian officials — say this is not about lowering standards but about a political formula that would place Kyiv at the table before all formal reforms are completed.

The five-step plan — in brief

Step 1 — Prepare Ukraine: The EU provides detailed, practical guidance on negotiating clusters so Kyiv knows the working agenda. This is not a shortcut on reforms, but clear roadmaps.

Step 2 — Create a simplified form of membership: the idea of "reverse enlargement" — accession with the gradual granting of rights and obligations, creating a political signal of support when full ratification is delayed.

Step 3 — Wait for Orbán to leave: unanimity among the 27 countries is a stumbling block, and Brussels is betting on a change in the political balance in Budapest after the 2026 elections.

Step 4 — Play the Trump card: there is an expectation that U.S. influence on certain capitals could help lift vetoes; the document also links eurointegration to a peace plan being worked on by partners.

Step 5 — Use pressure instruments: if other mechanisms fail, Brussels can bring back for consideration Article 7 of the EU Treaty — a political sanction that can suspend a member's rights.

The EU position and political risks

As Politico’s interlocutors emphasize, this is more a political instrument than a legal circumvention of criteria. According to one EU official, "membership of the EU brings benefits only if there is transformation through the enlargement process — that is the real superpower of EU membership". In other words, the reform focus remains, but the sequence of granting political rights changes.

"Membership of the EU brings benefits only if there is transformation through the enlargement process — that is the real superpower of EU membership"

— an EU official, comment to Politico

Hungary — the key bottleneck

Unanimity among the 27 makes Viktor Orbán's position decisive. Brussels is counting on Hungary's elections in spring 2026; if Orbán remains in power, tougher political measures could be used, including Article 7. At the same time, the EU is aware of the political risks of applying such pressure ahead of those elections.

"The States will take responsibility to work with some EU countries politically so that they do not block Ukraine's accession"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine (6 February 2026)

What this means for Ukraine

First, the plan creates political space: being "at the table" strengthens Kyiv's position in dealings with Moscow and accelerates integration expectations. Second, it does not remove the need for reforms — the EU openly says there will be "no shortcuts to reforms." Third, success depends on the foreign policy of partners: the position of the United States, the stance of individual capitals and the outcomes of EU elections will determine the pace.

Brief conclusion

Politico records an ambitious but politically calibrated Brussels strategy: to move Ukraine's eurointegration from declarations to a concrete plan of action while retaining levers of pressure. Now it is up to the partners — can they turn political will into concrete steps without undermining the reform process and without deepening divisions within Europe?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026