Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Jet-Powered 'Shaheed' as a Cruise Missile at a Drone's Price: Why Old Air Defense Can't Keep Up"

Russia is deploying Shahed-238/Geran-3 drones at speeds up to 600 km/h and altitudes up to 9 km — beyond the range of interceptor drones. Fedorov acknowledged the problem and promised a solution, but did not name any specific measures.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 8, 2026 · 3 min read

"Jet-Powered 'Shaheed' as a Cruise Missile at a Drone's Price: Why Old Air Defense Can't Keep Up"
Михайло Федоров (фото: Міноборони)

On the night of July 31, 2025, Russia used jet-powered unmanned drones against Kyiv en masse for the first time. Out of 317 launched drones and missiles, air defense neutralized 291. Some jet-powered drones broke through. According to 24 Channel, this type of drone is responsible for the breakthroughs that regular interceptors cannot stop in time.

Why 600 km/h is a different category of threat

A regular "Shahed-136" flies at a speed of about 185 km/h — an interceptor drone with an electric motor can catch up with it and destroy it. The jet-powered modification Shahed-238 (known in Russia as "Geran-3") accelerates to 500–600 km/h and rises to 9 km altitude. This is no longer a "target for an interceptor" — analysts directly describe it as a cruise missile at the price of a drone.

"Such characteristics make the Shahed-238 practically unreachable for both mobile fire groups and interceptor drones with electric engines."

Analysts, quoted by Focus.ua

An additional factor is the black-colored fuselage to reduce visual visibility at night and a block with 16-channel satellite navigation antennas instead of the four-channel ones on earlier versions. The warhead is up to 90 kg.

What the Defense Ministry admitted — and what it didn't say

Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov wrote on Telegram that jet-powered "Shaheds" are the main challenge for air defense: the Kremlin is scaling up production, and Ukraine together with manufacturers is seeking technological solutions. At the same time, no specific details — neither timeline nor type of weapon — were mentioned.

In parallel, Fedorov announced the expansion of the private air defense model: companies can form their own groups, receive weapons, and operate under the coordination of the Air Force. The first such group is already operating in the Kharkiv region. This is a scaling up of "small" air defense, which is effective against slow drones — but not against jet-powered ones.

Interceptor drones: impressive statistics with a caveat

In March, Ukrainian interceptor drones destroyed over 33,000 Russian unmanned aerial vehicles — twice as many as in February. The "Nemesis" brigade alone destroyed 60 Shahed-type attack drones from March to April. But all this statistics concerns subsonic targets.

  • Against Shahed-136/131 (~185 km/h) — interceptor drones work.
  • Against Shahed-238/"Geran-3" (~600 km/h, altitude up to 9 km) — there are "almost no" available solutions, according to analysts' assessment.
  • Russia is already integrating technologies that allow jet-powered drones to bypass even those countermeasures that already exist.

The price question: the Iranian side initially asked $1.4 million for one Shahed-238. Even if Russia manufactures "Geran-3" cheaper — it is still an order of magnitude more expensive than a regular "Shahed." But if one such drone breaks through air defense and hits a power substation or factory — the economics of the attack for Russia are justified.

The first confirmed combat use of Shahed-238 against Ukraine was recorded in early 2024; mass nighttime attacks with jet-powered drones became regular in 2025. That is, between the emergence of the threat and public acknowledgment of the problem at the minister's level, one and a half years passed.

If Ukraine does not receive or develop interceptors capable of operating at altitudes of 7–9 km at speeds exceeding 600 km/h, the statistics of destroyed drones will grow — and so will the percentage of breakthroughs by precisely these jet-powered targets.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026