Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Referendum on a Ceasefire: Zelensky Sets 60-Day Minimum and Explains the Risks

The President said that without a 60-day ceasefire the vote could be illegitimate — we explain why this issue is important for citizens' security and Ukraine's negotiating position.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 26, 2025 · 2 min read

Referendum on a Ceasefire: Zelensky Sets 60-Day Minimum and Explains the Risks

An important nuance in the official protocols

In an interview with Axios, President Volodymyr Zelensky said he is ready to put the updated "peace plan" to a referendum provided there is a ceasefire of at least 60 days. This is not a symbolic demand: it concerns the basic guarantees of security and the legitimacy of the vote.

According to the president, 60 days is the minimum time needed to set up polling stations, transport voters and create conditions under which citizens can vote safely. Holding a referendum amid active shelling risks turning the result into a subject of doubt and legal challenges.

"I have some intelligence data <…> but I am now at the stage where I want to believe only the words of leaders"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine (interview with Axios)

Context and timeline

Key dates: on December 24 the president published all 20 points of the updated draft peace agreement, some of which are contentious; on December 26 he said the plan is 90% ready. The question now shifts from the text of the document to the ability to ensure conditions for its legitimate adoption.

Practical implications

A referendum during wartime requires not only political agreement but also clear mechanisms for controlling the ceasefire, international monitoring and logistical support. If these conditions are not met, the result can be challenged both domestically and on the international stage — which would weaken Ukraine's negotiating position.

The president's statement emphasizes two things: first, the safety of citizens; second, the need to turn partners' declarations into real guarantees. Without external oversight and technical guarantees, a 60-day ceasefire risks remaining only on paper.

Summary — what next?

Zelensky's decision moves the referendum issue from the realm of political intentions into the practical sphere: talks are now needed on mechanisms for a ceasefire and international guarantees for its implementation. If such mechanisms do not materialize, the vote could become a basis for legal and political disputes and would not strengthen — but rather weaken — Ukraine's position.

Will partners be able to provide a sufficient ceasefire regime so that the referendum can be held legitimately and safely? The answer to that question will determine not only the form of the vote but the next phase of peace negotiations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026