Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia strengthens its presence in Transnistria and sets up drone production

The Main Directorate of Intelligence warns of the deployment of UAV production in Transnistria, the removal of weapons from storage and mobilization measures; the risk of sabotage groups infiltrating Ukraine is increasing.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 10, 2025 · 1 min read

Russia strengthens its presence in Transnistria and sets up drone production

Activity in the region

A representative of the Main Directorate of Intelligence (GUR) reported that in the self-proclaimed Transnistria Russia has resumed storage and begun deploying production of unmanned aerial vehicles, and is also reactivating weapons in depots.

According to him, Moscow is increasing its presence in this part of Moldova in order to divert Ukraine’s attention and resources because of the threat from the Russian enclave.

Measures and structures

Mobilization measures have been intensified in the region: reservists are being called up into military units, and equipment and ammunition are being restored at arsenals. At the same time, UAV production is being rolled out and centers for training drone operators are being established.

According to intelligence, Russia is also deploying personnel from its security services to Transnistria, tasking them with exacerbating crises, spreading disinformation, organizing provocations, and carrying out sabotage operations.

Goals and risks

GUR believes these steps are aimed at strengthening Russia’s position in the region: to use Transnistria to destabilize Moldova and create a point of tension near Ukraine’s southern border.

The intelligence assessment is that, against this backdrop, the likelihood of sabotage groups infiltrating Ukrainian territory from Transnistria is increasing.

In addition, the agency links the Kremlin’s current activity to preparations for a hybrid operation with a political component ahead of the so‑called 2026 elections for the “president of the PMR”: the goal is to restore the region’s energy dependence on the Russian Federation, raise the ratings of pro‑Russian leaders, and covertly increase the military presence for possible further escalation.

After Gazprom halted supplies in early 2025, the Moldovan authorities averted a critical situation in Transnistria: the region now purchases its key energy resource from Moldovagaz.

  • On 13 June 2025 the President of Moldova confirmed the risk of additional Russian troops being stationed in unrecognized Transnistria.
  • In July she said that genuine negotiations between Russia and Ukraine could create conditions for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Transnistria.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026