Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia is preparing the information groundwork to refuse to recognize elections in Ukraine — Zelensky warns

The Kremlin, according to the Office of the President, is shaping narratives that would enable it to declare the election results "illegitimate." We explain what this means for the security of voting and what steps are needed to safeguard legitimacy.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 27, 2025 · 2 min read

Russia is preparing the information groundwork to refuse to recognize elections in Ukraine — Zelensky warns

What the president said

Volodymyr Zelensky reported that Russia is already mounting an information campaign aimed at preparing the ground to refuse to recognize possible presidential elections in Ukraine. The president confirmed his political readiness to hold elections, but stressed that the key is ensuring security for citizens and creating the legal and international basis for recognizing the results.

"Russia itself is illegitimate and therefore will send messages about the illegitimacy of Ukrainian authorities"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

What exactly is causing concern

According to a statement from the Office of the President, the head of state heard a report from the Foreign Intelligence Service: the Kremlin's task is to show that allegedly "many people live in Ukraine who have the right to vote," including those who are on the territory of Russia or in temporarily occupied territories. This provides a tool for manipulation — to overstate the scale of participation of certain groups and then call the legitimacy of the electoral process into question.

Analysts at Western centers (for example, the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Institute for the Study of War) have long warned about the combination of information pressure and administrative manipulation as a classic technique for delegitimizing authorities after elections. In the current circumstances, such a scenario is especially risky because of the presence of Russian narratives in the media and on social networks.

What practical steps the authorities propose

The president emphasized three core requirements: security for voting, the presence of international observers, and a legislative basis for recognizing the results. An important signal is the restoration of the State Voter Register, which has already begun, as well as the formation of working groups in the Verkhovna Rada to develop procedures during martial law.

These are not only technical steps: coordinated communication with partners is also necessary so that international institutions record the rules of the game in advance and have access to verifications. The immediate task is to minimize opportunities for falsification or for an external actor to impose the narrative of "illegitimacy" of the results.

What to expect and the consequences

If clear procedures are not established and the presence of international missions is not ensured, the risk of discrediting the results increases. For the reader, this means: the legitimacy of a vote is not only the act of voting at polling stations, but also work in diplomacy, the information space, and law.

The positive news is the reaction of authorities: the opening of the voter register and the formation of working groups. The next stage is to turn partners' declarations into concrete guarantees of security and international monitoring.

Conclusion

Russian tactics of delegitimization are predictable, but not invulnerable. The task of Ukraine and its partners is to close procedural loopholes, strengthen security, and ensure transparent international oversight. Whether partners will turn words of support into concrete mechanisms that make elections resistant to external discreditation is a question that affects not only the political but also the international-legal resilience of our state.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026