Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia Threatens Hungarians with "Maidan" — While Opposition Leads in All Polls

Vox Harbor analyzed 628,000 Telegram messages and found a coordinated fear campaign aimed at deterring voters from voting against Orbán, whom Moscow openly supports.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Russia Threatens Hungarians with "Maidan" — While Opposition Leads in All Polls
Віктор Орбан (фото: ЕРА)

On April 12, Hungarians will vote in parliamentary elections where Viktor Orbán faces his first real risk of losing in 16 years. According to Politico's Poll of Polls, opposition candidate Péter Márki-Zay's party "Tisza" is polling at around 48% compared to 39% for the ruling "Fidesz." It is precisely at this moment that analysts at Vox Harbor detected a large-scale intimidation campaign on Telegram.

628,000 messages — one goal

Researchers analyzed over 628,000 Telegram messages and discovered coordinated waves of identical content. A significant portion of such messages, according to Vox Harbor's findings, are distributed by users connected to Russia or of Russian origin. The message is simple: Orbán's defeat will result in catastrophe — instability, loss of sovereignty, a "Maidan."

"Everyone understands that Ukraine is preparing a Maidan in Hungary"

— pro-Russian propagandist Vladimir Kornilov on his Telegram channel, March 23

As documented by Kyiv Independent, this phrase is a distorted quote from American journalist Michael Weiss, who was merely theoretically discussing a possible scenario if Orbán tried to "steal" the election. The context disappeared when reposted.

Not just Telegram: an entire ecosystem

Telegram is just one channel. According to the Financial Times, Russia has engaged the Social Design Agency — a structure under Western sanctions that the U.S. Department of Justice accused in 2024 of launching the "Doppelgänger" network of fake news websites. The agency's task is to portray Márki-Zay as a "puppet of Brussels" and discredit "Tisza" as a party of "incompetence and hidden agendas."

In parallel, the pro-Russian group Storm-1516 — an offshoot of the "Internet Research Agency," known for interference in the 2016 U.S. elections — operates. It has already fabricated Euronews materials to spread fake information about Márki-Zay, using the same technology Storm-1516 employed during Germany's February 2025 elections, which prompted an official diplomatic protest from Berlin.

TikTok removed hundreds of accounts impersonating Hungarian candidates ahead of the vote and thousands of videos violating the platform's election rules. Meta, however, reported that it imposed no restrictions on the prime minister's accounts.

Paradox: Russia protects the one who protects himself

Orbán has spent years blocking military aid to Ukraine in the EU and publicly maintained ties with the Kremlin. Yet external support through disinformation creates an inconvenient narrative for him: a leader who appeals to sovereignty wins thanks to foreign interference — only from the other side.

According to the European Observatory of Digital Media (EDMO), "entire ecosystems based on artificial intelligence are created to spread pro-government messages, and platform rules on political advertising are systematically violated." "Fidesz" allies released 14 AI-generated video clips against Márki-Zay — which he himself publicly acknowledged.

If "Tisza" wins on April 12 despite all this pressure — it will be the first documented case where a coordinated pro-Russian intimidation campaign failed in an EU country with an electoral system Orbán has spent years adapting to suit himself. Will voters have enough immunity to fear if the ballot box stands next to a neighbor whom these messages actually convinced?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026