Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia violated Ukrainian ceasefire within minutes. Zelensky promises response "day by day"

From midnight on May 6, Russia attacks Ukraine with drones, missiles and air bombs — despite the ceasefire announced by Kyiv. Zelenskyy calls this "long-range sanctions in response," but the deterrence mechanism remains unclear so far.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Russia violated Ukrainian ceasefire within minutes. Zelensky promises response "day by day"
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: Офіс президента)

At 00:00 on May 6, Ukraine announced a unilateral ceasefire. Russia violated it within minutes. By the morning of May 7, the Armed Forces of Ukraine recorded 108 attack drones and three missiles — data confirmed by Ukraine's Air Force and Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha. Of these, 89 drones were shot down or suppressed, while the remaining nine, along with the missiles, struck eight facilities.

What happened overnight

The most documented incident involved two drones hitting a kindergarten in central Sumy. A security guard was killed, two others wounded. No children were present at the facility. Significant damage to civilian objects was also recorded in Kharkiv, Donetsk, and Kherson regions. In parallel, the Armed Forces repelled dozens of assault actions on key front lines and dozens of air strikes using guided bombs.

There was no silence on the front from the first second. This is not a departure from the ceasefire — it is its complete disregard by Moscow.

Why Kyiv announced the ceasefire

Zelenskyy took this step after Russia announced its own pause on May 8–9 — on the days marking the 81st anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany. Kyiv proposed extending the ceasefire, effectively giving Moscow a public test of its readiness for diplomacy. European partners viewed this gesture as a demonstration of peacefulness.

"Moscow once again ignored a realistic and fair call to cease fire."

Andriy Sybiha, Foreign Minister of Ukraine

"Long-range sanctions" — what lies behind this

Ukraine's response, as formulated by Zelenskyy through his own terminology: "long-range sanctions" — strikes on Russian territory in response to every attack on Ukraine. The principle is mirror-like: they strike us — we strike back. The President warned that Ukraine "will act fairly — day by day."

However, specific targets, timeline, or response criteria have not been publicly announced. "Long-range sanctions" is a framing for domestic and international audiences, rather than a documented military doctrine.

  • 108 drones and 3 missiles on the first night after the ceasefire announcement
  • 89 intercepted or suppressed by electronic warfare
  • Strikes on Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk, and Kherson regions
  • Dozens of assault actions on the front — in parallel with overnight strikes

What's next

Russia, according to Zelenskyy's assessment, is interested solely in "short-term silence on Red Square" on May 9 — not in a genuine ceasefire. If this is the case, pressure on the front may increase after the holiday events: Moscow does not need international backlash precisely on the day of the parade, but after that, restraining factors diminish.

The key question is not whether Ukraine will respond — but whether partners will document these violations as grounds for strengthening sanctions against Russia: if not, "long-range sanctions" will remain Kyiv's only real instrument of response.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026