Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia Bets on Rocket-Powered "Gerans": Why Ukraine Needs Rocket Interceptors

Defense Express expert Ivan Kyrychevskyi warns: while FPV interceptors are coping with the "Geran‑3", the mass deployment of the "Geran‑4/5" will change air-defense requirements. We examine what this means for the defense industry and the front.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Russia Bets on Rocket-Powered "Gerans": Why Ukraine Needs Rocket Interceptors
Іван Киричевський (Фото: facebook.com / ivan kiricevs.kij)

What's happening

According to LIGA.net and a comment to the outlet from Defense Express expert Ivan Kyrychevskyi, the Russians are gradually shifting the emphasis to jet-powered unmanned aerial vehicles of the "Geran" family. Ukrainian units currently employ FPV interceptors as a mass, cheap, and flexible means against Shahed drones. But the emergence of faster jet-powered variants changes the math of interception.

Why this matters

Speed and flight profile determine the time available for detection, transition into the engagement zone, and the interceptor itself. If a "Geran-3" can be caught by a conventional FPV drone, the "Geran-4" and "Geran-5" already travel at speeds close to those of cruise missiles — and traditional cheap-mass solutions lose effectiveness. This forces changes not only in tactics but also in the technological tasks assigned to industry.

"It turned out that the jet-powered 'Geran-3' is so slow that it can be caught and shot down by a regular FPV drone. But jet-powered 'Geran-4' and 'Geran-5' are also coming into play. Their flight speed is higher — literally like that of a cruise missile."

— Ivan Kyrychevskyi, serviceman of the 413th Regiment of the Unmanned Systems Forces “Reid”, weapons expert (Defense Express)

Examples and possible responses

The world already has examples of jet anti-air drones and single-use/recoverable missile-drones: the American Coyote Block 2 and Coyote Block 3 with ranges up to ~15 km, and the Iranian "358"/"359". This proves the task is technologically solvable, but it requires time, resources, and coordination.

"Perhaps, over time our designers will have to, in a short timeframe, develop a jet anti-air drone so that it can operate en masse against Russian jet 'Gerans.'"

— Ivan Kyrychevskyi, Defense Express (comment for LIGA.net)

What the command is already doing

Personnel and structural steps within the Air Force indicate a reorientation: under Deputy Commander Pavlo Yelizarov they are forming a "small" air defense, and the new command is to coordinate counter-UAV efforts. The President and military leadership have approved a structure intended to speed up decision-making and the introduction of new air defense means.

Consequences and a brief forecast

If Russia does move jet UAVs into mass production, Ukraine will need to do three things simultaneously: accelerate research and development, ramp up serial production of the appropriate interceptors, and seek technological assistance from partners. This is a resource and organizational challenge, but not a technical fatality. The effectiveness of the future response will depend on how quickly the state and industry can transform existing FPV-interceptor experience into a jet-powered product line.

In short: today FPV interceptors work — tomorrow a jet-powered counterpart may be needed. Time and cooperation with partners will be decisive.

Sources: LIGA.net (comment by Ivan Kyrychevskyi), Defense Express, open data on Coyote Block 2/3, and information on the Iranian models "358/359".

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026