Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russia signals the US about recognizing Crimea — Zelensky: Kyiv will not support a decision contrary to the Constitution

In great-power diplomacy, quiet agreements matter more than loud statements. Zelensky warns: if negotiations between Washington and Moscow touch on Ukrainian interests, Kyiv will not support recognition of Crimea or other deals that contradict the Constitution. We examine why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 7, 2026 · 1 min read

Russia signals the US about recognizing Crimea — Zelensky: Kyiv will not support a decision contrary to the Constitution

Briefly

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, at a meeting with journalists on February 6 (LIGA.net correspondent), said that Russia may signal to the U.S. to recognize Crimea, but Kyiv will not support such arrangements if they contradict the Constitution and the interests of Ukrainians.

Kyiv's position

"I believe that, most likely, Russia is sending a signal to America — recognize Crimea. Knowing that Ukraine will not recognize it. And knowing that Ukraine has influence in the European arena"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Zelenskyy stressed that Ukraine will insist on participation in discussions that affect its territorial integrity, and will not support decisions that "decide for us" issues contrary to national legislation.

What the US and Russia are proposing

According to the president, proposals may appear in relations between Moscow and Washington that do not directly concern Kyiv but affect its interests. Zelenskyy also reported an economic offer from Russia to the U.S. of $12 trillion and about Washington's proposal to end the war by summer and hold tripartite talks in Miami.

Why it matters

If part of the negotiations on the status of the occupied territories takes place without Ukraine's participation, there is a risk of legitimizing the annexations and creating a precedent that undermines international norms. Analysts point out that recognition of Crimea as Russian would be more than a symbolic step — it would have consequences for sanctions, security in Europe, and confidence in guarantees of territorial integrity.

"And this must certainly not happen contrary to the interests of Ukrainians"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Conclusion

Kyiv sets a clear condition: any compromises regarding territories must be agreed with Ukraine and conform to the Constitution. Now the question for partners is whether they are ready to turn diplomatic signals and declarations into agreements that will not create new risks for Ukraine and the region?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026