Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Investigation into Louvre robbery: thieves fled in 30 seconds

The Ministry of Culture has determined that the attackers left the scene of the robbery 30 seconds before police arrived; failures were detected in the video surveillance system, the dispatch service and security coordination. The jewelry is valued at €88 million.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 10, 2025 · 2 min read

Investigation into Louvre robbery: thieves fled in 30 seconds

Results of the investigation

The investigation into the October attack on the Louvre found that the suspects left the museum approximately 30 seconds before law enforcement arrived. A review initiated by France’s Ministry of Culture also established that only one of two surveillance cameras near the point of entry was operational.

In the report presented during hearings of the Senate’s culture committee, it was noted that the control room did not have enough screens to view the feeds simultaneously, and that insufficient internal coordination led to the police initially arriving at the wrong address.

This underscores the overall inability of the museum, and its supervisory bodies, to resolve security issues

– Laurent Lafon

Museum security issues

The investigative team said the attackers had only seconds before the police and private security arrived, which made their retreat possible. The head of the team stressed simple measures that could have impeded the robbery, including modern CCTV systems, stronger protective glass and better internal coordination of staff.

Given those 30 seconds, Securitas guards or police officers in the car could have prevented the thieves' escape

– Noël Corben

Several inspections over the past ten years revealed significant gaps in the museum’s security system. A 2019 audit conducted by experts from the jewellery firm Van Cleef & Arpels noted that the riverside balcony was vulnerable and could be easily reached using extension ladders — which is exactly what the perpetrators used.

The recommendations were not heeded, as they would have allowed us to avoid this robbery

– Noël Corben

Corben also said that museum director Laurence des Cars was not informed about the audit commissioned by her predecessor Jean‑Luc Martinez, and that there was a lack of coordination between the two government-appointed administrators.

Timeline and consequences

Police believe they have detained all four suspects who fled the scene on motorcycles. Investigators estimate the robbery in the Apollo Gallery lasted about ten minutes.

  • On October 19 four people posing as museum staff entered the Louvre, damaged display cases in the Apollo Gallery and stole nine pieces of jewellery; during their escape they dropped Empress Eugénie’s crown, set with 1,354 diamonds.
  • Total losses are estimated at €88 million; the stolen items were not insured, so no payout is expected.
  • After the theft part of the jewellery collection was moved to the underground vault of the Bank of France.
  • On November 25 the Paris police arrested the last suspect in the case.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026