Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Rubio Fixes Pause in Negotiations — and Explains It by Ukraine's Confidence on the Front

U.S. State Secretary acknowledged that the peace process "has somewhat lost momentum," and cited an unexpected reason: Ukraine's strengthened position on the battlefield. According to this logic, the better Kyiv fights, the fewer incentives it has to sit at the negotiating table.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Rubio Fixes Pause in Negotiations — and Explains It by Ukraine's Confidence on the Front
Марко Рубіо (Фото: Will Oliver/EPA)

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged in a Fox News interview that peace negotiations regarding Russia's war against Ukraine "have somewhat lost momentum for various reasons." But the list of these reasons proved revealing.

What Rubio named as the drivers of the pause

According to the Secretary of State, the negotiation process has been slowed not only by Moscow's position. He directly listed: Ukrainians are becoming increasingly confident in their battlefield positions, they have survived the winter — while Russians, in turn, feel a certain optimism due to rising oil prices. Both sides believe time is on their side.

"Ukrainians feel increasingly more confident in their battlefield positions; they have survived the winter; Russians feel a certain optimism because the price of oil has risen."

Marco Rubio, Fox News

This logic has concrete confirmation. According to an ISW assessment published on May 10, Russian forces have not achieved any significant operational breakthrough over the past year, while the Ukrainian Armed Forces have gained the most notable positions on the front since the Kursk operation in August 2024 — in particular, they liberated a significant part of Kupyansk and over 400 square kilometers in the south during counteroffensive operations.

Washington's position: ready, but not imposing

Rubio confirmed that the United States maintains its intention to serve as a mediator — and is convinced that Washington is the only country capable of doing so.

"We are ready, the President is ready, his team is ready to facilitate a diplomatic end to the war."

Marco Rubio, Fox News

At the same time, the Secretary of State cautioned: if neither side wants to move forward, the United States will not impose the process. A week earlier, he suggested the possibility of Washington withdrawing from mediation in the absence of progress.

The price of the pause — in lives and money

Rubio cited figures that are rarely heard in diplomatic discourse: Russia loses between 15,000 and 20,000 soldiers killed monthly, and he called the damage to the Russian economy "colossal." For Ukraine — two decades of reconstruction regardless of when the war ends.

  • Russian losses: 15,000–20,000 killed per month according to the US Secretary of State's estimate
  • Ukraine's reconstruction: at least 20 years, according to Rubio
  • State of negotiations: a three-way format has not convened since February 2026

According to Interfax-Ukraine, Russia recently announced that it is withdrawing from the negotiation process and will not return unless Ukraine withdraws its armed forces from Donetsk and Luhansk regions — a condition Kyiv will not accept.

If the Ukrainian Armed Forces maintain the pace of their counteroffensive in the south and in the Kupyansk direction through the end of summer — will Moscow's calculation about "whose time it is" change?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026