Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Rubio, Cuba and the US elections: how a foreign operation could redraw the political map — and why it matters for Ukraine

Pavlo Klimkin in LIGA.net suggests that success in Venezuela and a weakening of Cuba could give Marco Rubio a powerful boost in the elections. We explain why this scenario matters not only for the United States but also for transatlantic support for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Rubio, Cuba and the US elections: how a foreign operation could redraw the political map — and why it matters for Ukraine

A quiet mechanism that could change everything

Former foreign minister Pavlo Klimkin, in an interview for the LIGA.net YouTube project, suggested that if U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio achieves a notable success regarding Cuba, it could turn into a significant campaign advantage. This is not just political theory: according to Klimkin, he relied on the results of three recent polls showing an increase in Donald Trump's ratings after the operation in Venezuela.

What Klimkin specifically said

"If he brings this Venezuela story to a conclusion, he will be in a very good position. If he topples the Cuban regime, it is highly likely he will be the next president of the United States"

— Pavlo Klimkin, former foreign minister

The demographic factor and real politics

Klimkin also drew attention to demographics: about 60 million people in the U.S. speak Spanish. Rubio himself is an American of Cuban descent from Miami; his ethnic background and public stance on Cuba make him especially relevant to Latino voters. Under such conditions, foreign policy successes can instantly convert into domestic political capital.

Events in Venezuela as a catalyst

Klimkin's piece also refers to recent incidents in Venezuela: on the night of January 3 explosions were heard in Caracas and aircraft were active; it was later reported that the U.S. conducted an operation. Statements by Trump followed about the arrest of Nicolas Maduro and his wife; they were accused of drug trafficking. This is a series of statements and events that could fuel a narrative about the decisiveness of foreign policy and yield political dividends to those who position themselves as strong leaders.

What this means for Ukraine

This matters not only for Washington. In the short term, shifts in electoral sympathies in the U.S. can affect the balance of power in Congress and the executive branch, and therefore the pace and nature of transatlantic support for Ukraine. If the foreign policy agenda dominates key circles in the U.S., partners may reprioritize assistance. Analysts note: a strong mandate for a "tough" foreign policy is sometimes accompanied by demands to reallocate resources and conditions attached to aid.

Brief conclusion

The scenario Klimkin outlines is logical and based on a combination of demographic trends, foreign policy events, and public reaction. Whether these factors will translate into real electoral success for Rubio is an open question. For Ukraine the key task is not to react emotionally, but to maintain varied channels of communication with American partners and to prepare cooperation scenarios for different political configurations in Washington.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026