Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Sanctions as a coercion weapon: why Putin wants to force Europe to the negotiating table"

Estonia's Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna has revealed the mechanics of the Kremlin's tactics: involving Europe in negotiations is a way to freeze the next package of sanctions, in particular a complete ban on maritime services that could destroy Russia's shadow tanker fleet.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 25, 2026 · 3 min read

"Sanctions as a coercion weapon: why Putin wants to force Europe to the negotiating table"
Маргус Цахкна (Фото: EPA/Mykola Tys)

After a meeting of NATO foreign ministers, Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna articulated what is discussed cautiously in Brussels: behind Moscow's desire to involve Europe in the peace process lies not diplomatic pragmatism, but fear of a concrete economic blow.

"Putin needs to buy time. If Europe took on the role of mediator, we would no longer talk about the next sanctions package we are now preparing. There is one very painful thing that Putin fears — a complete ban on maritime services in the European Union and a whole series of other sanctions."

Margus Tsahkna, Foreign Minister of Estonia, ERR

What are "maritime services" and why this is not a technical term

This refers to insurance, vessel classification, and port services — without these, Russia's shadow tanker fleet cannot physically function. The EU's 20th sanctions package, presented by the European Commission in early February, already includes a ban on providing these services to tankers carrying Russian oil, as well as adding 43 new vessels to the shadow fleet list — which now numbers over 640 units.

The scale of the stakes explains the Kremlin's nervousness. According to the Black Sea Institute of Strategic Studies, in January 2025, Russia set a record for maritime oil exports from Baltic ports — 12.7 million tons. Almost half of these volumes were transported by vessels already included on the sanctions lists of the EU, USA, Great Britain, and Canada. A complete ban on insurance and services would nullify this scheme.

Tsahkna also recalled the broader context: negotiations that had lasted over a year were not negotiations at all, but merely "talks" that gave Putin time. Now Russia is actively promoting the idea of involving Europe as a mediator — and specific names have emerged.

Merkel, Stubb, Draghi — and why Tsahkna considers these discussions futile

According to Politico, the EU is discussing three candidates for the role of European mediator: former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi. Merkel previously conducted negotiations with Putin and Zelensky — without results. Finland's NATO membership makes Stubb's candidacy a priori unacceptable to Moscow.

Tsahkna commented on these discussions briefly: they are "not key and do not help advance the negotiation process". Instead, he called on Europe to use Russia's current weakness to increase pressure rather than seek ways to retreat.

"The tone has changed. Everyone understands that now is the time to pressure Russia. In a broader sense, we see that the situation in Russia is currently unstable."

Margus Tsahkna, interview with Bloomberg, May 2025

Where declaration diverges from mechanism

The problem is not in intentions but in coherence. The Trump administration did not join the EU sanctions against the shadow fleet — and it was precisely this that allowed the fleet to operate almost unimpeded despite all previous packages. When the U.S. Treasury in January 2025 imposed sanctions against 158 tankers in one stroke, the active capacity of the shadow fleet fell by 46% within weeks. The EU acted more slowly and gradually — and Russia managed to adapt.

  • 60% of tanker traffic with Russian oil passes through the Baltic Sea
  • In April 2024, shadow tankers transported 92 million barrels through the Baltic alone — 82% of all regional exports
  • After the U.S. "jumbo" sanctions, the share of shadow vessels at loading in Baltic ports fell from over 60% to less than 40%

If the 20th package is adopted and actually implemented — with revocation of insurers' and classification societies' licenses — the effect will be noticeable. If it is repeated as a declaration without an enforcement mechanism, Moscow will adapt again.

So the key question is not whether Putin fears sanctions — Tsahkna is convinced he does. The question is different: will all 27 EU member states agree to adopt and actually enforce a complete ban on maritime services if it means rising energy prices for their economies before the next elections?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026