Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

SBU and police neutralized a Russian agent-combat group — what this means for Ukraine’s security

Special operation "Enigma 2.0" in Ukraine and Moldova foiled a series of high-profile contract killings. We explain how the group operated, whom they intended to kill, and why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 20, 2026 · 2 min read

SBU and police neutralized a Russian agent-combat group — what this means for Ukraine’s security

Briefly: what happened and why it matters

The Security Service of Ukraine and the National Police, together with their Moldovan counterparts, announced the dismantling of an intelligence-combat group organized under the control of Russian special services. According to law enforcement, the group was preparing a number of high-profile assassinations — potential targets included a journalist, servicemen of the Main Directorate of Intelligence, the head of a state enterprise, and a civic activist.

How the perpetrators operated

According to the investigation, the operation had a clear structure: a recruitment component, reconnaissance of targets, the direct "killers" and logistical support. The suspects were brought into Ukraine posing as tourists, housed in rented accommodations, and kept in contact with a resident. Elements of social engineering were used for surveilling the targets — fake couriers, photo and video recording, and marking locations in publicly accessible services.

"As a result of joint actions, the head (resident) of the enemy cell — a 34-year-old repeat offender from Moldova — two of his agents, and their accomplices from Ukraine, the EU and unrecognized Transnistria were detained"

— Security Service of Ukraine, National Police

Funding for the preparation of the attacks was provided through crypto wallets and bank cards of foreign financial institutions. According to the investigation, payment for murders reached up to $100,000 depending on the 'status' of the target.

"Agents were then divided into groups. The first tracked the locations and daily routines of potential victims, the second were the 'killers' who were to carry out the contract killings"

— Law enforcement agencies (SSU/National Police)

What was found during searches and what the charges are

Firearms, ammunition, combat grenades and communication devices were seized from the detainees' residences. The suspects have already been informed of suspicion under articles on preparation for premeditated contract murder and illegal handling of weapons and ammunition; additional charges are being considered for the cell leader. These articles carry a sentence of life imprisonment with confiscation of property.

Why this happened: a rational explanation

The aim of such operations is not only the elimination of specific individuals. As law enforcement and analysts note, high-profile killings have instrumental value: they create panic, demoralize certain groups of citizens, and undermine trust in institutions. In particular, striking targets with military or informational links could weaken logistics, communication and volunteer networks, which is especially significant during wartime.

Context and background

The investigation fits into a broader trend: in the past there have been reports of other assassination attempts and recruitments (including mentions of attempted killings and uncovered militant cells). This underscores that the threat is transnational in nature and requires coordination with partners — both in neighboring countries and at the level of European security services.

Conclusion: what's next

This is an example of a successful coordinated special operation and preventive work. However, the fact that such attacks were planned is a signal to society and the state: to strengthen protection mechanisms for vulnerable groups, control financial flows and work on intelligence-sharing with partners. The case will next go to court and involve international cooperation — and how fully justice is restored and the activities of similar cells are halted will depend on that.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026