Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

SBU strikes "TamanNaftogaz" terminal for second time this month — blow to Russia's fuel transshipment and logistics

At night, SBU drones struck one of the largest Black Sea terminals — it was not only a tactical strike but also an escalation of pressure on Russian supply chains and the revenues that fund the war.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 17, 2026 · 2 min read

SBU strikes "TamanNaftogaz" terminal for second time this month — blow to Russia's fuel transshipment and logistics
Таманьнафтогаз (Фото: ресурс окупантів)

What happened

According to LIGA.net, overnight the Security Service of Ukraine struck the oil terminal Tamanneftogaz in Krasnodar Krai for the second time in the past month. Local residents reported a series of explosions and a fire at the facility.

"Drones of the Security Service of Ukraine struck the infrastructure of the Tamanneftogaz oil terminal in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, for the second time in the past month."

— LIGA.net (interlocutor in the security service)

Context and significance

The terminal is one of the largest in the Black Sea: its tank farm for storing oil products and liquefied gas exceeds 1 million m3. It is currently known that as a result of the previous attack on January 22 technological pipelines on the berths and several tanks (including tanks for vacuum gas oil and fuel oil) were damaged; estimated losses at that time were about ≈ $50 million.

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine also reported another strike on this terminal on February 15, 2026. Taken together, the events indicate systematic operational work against infrastructure targets that has not only tactical but also strategic effects on the enemy's logistics.

Why this matters for Ukraine and for the reader

First, strikes on transshipment capacities reduce the enemy's ability to supply fuel and ammonia by sea, complicating its logistics and increasing the costs of detours and insurance. Second, this affects revenue streams that sustain the war machine — which is why such facilities are priority targets in an asymmetric strategy.

Analysts and military experts note that the ability of Ukrainian unmanned systems to operate deep inside enemy territory shifts the tactical balance and imposes additional administrative and financial burdens on Russia in securing port infrastructure.

Background

In addition to the January 22 strike (damaged pipelines and tanks, fires, losses ~ $50 million), on the night of December 22 last year drones also struck the Tamanneftogaz marine oil terminal — then firefighting lasted for more than a day. This is a pattern of repeated strikes on the same logistical node.

What’s next

In the short term, Russia's need to diversify routes and increase protection of critical infrastructure will grow. For Ukraine, such operations simultaneously serve a tactical function (stopping current supplies) and a strategic one — destroying or complicating the enemy's long-term logistical capacities. The next move will be up to partners and markets: how long the Russians will be able to compensate for these losses and at what cost.

Sources: LIGA.net (comment from an interlocutor in the security service), reports from the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine; local reports of explosions and fires.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026