Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

U.S. delays national security strategy amid disputes over China

The release of two of Trump's strategic national-security documents was delayed amid disputes over wording on China. The Treasury Secretary demanded that the rhetoric be toned down because of trade talks with Beijing.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 4, 2025 · 2 min read

U.S. delays national security strategy amid disputes over China
Міністр фінансів Скотт Бессент виступає під час заходу для дітей на тему «Рахунки Трампа» в кімнаті Рузвельта Білого дому, 2 грудня 2025 року, у Вашингтоні. | Еван Вуччі/AP

The Donald Trump administration delayed the publication of two key security documents over disagreements about wording on China. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent demanded changes to the rhetoric, given trade negotiations with Beijing.

Reasons for the delay

The National Security Strategy and the National Defense Strategy were supposed to be published last fall. The documents went through several rounds of edits after Bessent's intervention, as he insisted on adjusting language concerning China.

According to three sources familiar with the matter, the treasury secretary wanted to soften some wording about Beijing's actions. The exact nature of the changes remains unknown, but any edits to one document required analogous adjustments to the other.

In addition to the China issue, the new strategy pays more attention to the Western Hemisphere than previous versions. This concerns migration, drug cartels and relations with Latin America.

Officials' positions

The Treasury Department responded with a restrained statement:

Bessent is 100 percent aligned with President Trump on the approach to relations with China, as is the rest of the administration

– a U.S. Treasury Department official

At the same time, Defense Secretary Pete Hegset plans to deliver a speech on accelerating weapons production to counter the Chinese threat. He is also working on creating a military communications system between the U.S. and the PRC to prevent conflicts.

Controversial policy toward Beijing

Bessent said at a conference that China is meeting commitments under the trade deal, including purchasing 12 million tons of soybeans by February 2026.

China is on track to fulfill every part of the agreement

– Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary

These statements contrast with the tense situation in the Indo-Pacific region, where Beijing is increasing its military presence. The PRC regularly sends fighter jets and warships to the waters off Taiwan, despite U.S. law supporting the island.

Shift in priorities

The last National Security Strategy was released in 2022 under the Biden administration. That document emphasized competition with China and Russia, domestic industrial policy and climate change.

The new version retains these themes but increases the focus on defending the American continent. Similar changes occurred in the National Defense Strategy, which has raised concerns among military commanders.

Context

Both documents are due to be released this month. After their publication the administration will present a "global posture review" — an analysis of the deployment of U.S. military assets worldwide. Allies from Germany to South Korea, where tens of thousands of U.S. service members are stationed, are eagerly awaiting this review.

For most administrations the National Security Strategy is released once per term. Therefore, the participation of the Treasury Secretary and other cabinet members in discussions is common practice, which ensures a coordinated position across the government.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026