Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

U.S. Demands Guarantees from the ICC That There Will Be No Prosecutions

The Trump administration is demanding that the International Criminal Court amend the Rome Statute and provide written guarantees that the court will not investigate the actions of the president, the vice president and other officials; it is also asking that two other cases be dropped.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 10, 2025 · 1 min read

U.S. Demands Guarantees from the ICC That There Will Be No Prosecutions

The administration of the U.S. president warned of possible new sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) if it does not amend its founding document and confirm that it will not open investigations into President Donald Trump and other senior officials.

U.S. circles have voiced concern that after 2029 the court could focus on the president, the vice president, the secretary of defense and other individuals and initiate criminal proceedings against them, which Washington considers unacceptable.

An administration representative did not specify particular issues that, in the view of U.S. authorities, could be grounds for investigation, but referred to open discussion of this possibility in international legal circles.

U.S. demands of the ICC

Washington is demanding that the court amend the Rome Statute and provide clear assurances that matters concerning senior U.S. officials will not be subject to investigation. In addition, the administration has put forward two other demands: to halt the investigation into Israeli leaders in connection with the war in Gaza and to officially conclude the review of actions by U.S. units in Afghanistan.

Possible sanctions

If the International Criminal Court does not meet these demands, Washington has threatened to impose sanctions on individual court officials and to introduce restrictions on the institution itself. According to the administration, these demands have already been communicated to the court.

Officials also insist that the Rome Statute explicitly state the absence of jurisdiction to initiate relevant investigations concerning leaders and other senior U.S. officials.

  • In June 2025 the U.S. administration imposed sanctions on four ICC judges over what it deemed "illegal and unfounded" actions against the United States or Israel; the court rejected those measures.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026