Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Shmyhal on energy: why the defense minister's move matters for restoring networks

The President has proposed Denys Shmyhal for the post of Deputy Prime Minister — Minister of Energy. This is not just a personnel reshuffle: it is about accelerating the restoration of infrastructure after Russian strikes and strengthening coordination across sectors.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 3, 2026 · 2 min read

Shmyhal on energy: why the defense minister's move matters for restoring networks

President's position

Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that he expects support from the Verkhovna Rada for the candidacy of the current Minister of Defence, Denys Shmyhal, for the post of Vice Prime Minister — Minister of Energy. The President emphasized that it is the systematic approach Shmyhal demonstrated at the Defence Ministry that is also needed in the energy sector.

"It is important that after every Russian strike we can promptly restore what was destroyed and that the development of Ukrainian energy is stable and sufficient for Ukraine's needs"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Why this matters

Energy during wartime is a matter of security and everyday life. When networks are damaged by attacks, the decisive role is played not only by repair crews but also by the coordination of logistics, financing, and interagency cooperation. These are precisely the strengths the President attributes to Shmyhal.

Context and timeline

Shmyhal has headed the Ministry of Defence since 17 July 2025. Prior to this, personnel changes in the energy sector accelerated: on 19 November 2025 parliamentarians approved the dismissal of former minister Hrynchuk amid an NABU investigation in the "Midas" case. Simultaneously, consultations are taking place at the highest level — Zelenskyy discussed the candidacy with Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko.

Pros and risks of the decision

Advantages: faster decision-making during crises, unified coordination of infrastructure restoration, the possibility of combining defence logistics with the reconstruction of energy systems.

Risks: a personnel vacuum at the Ministry of Defence, resistance in parliament, questions about technical expertise in complex energy matters, and increased scrutiny from anti-corruption investigations in the sector.

What comes next

The decision must pass through parliament — and here the decisive factors will be not only the vote but also the plan to turn declarations into concrete budgets, contracts, and technical restoration programmes. Analysts and the expert community are already watching whether the new leader can combine military coordination with long-term energy reforms.

Summary: this personnel decision is an attempt to combine operational speed and systemic approach across two critically important spheres. The ball is now in parliament's court: will it back this format, and will promises be translated into practical steps for secure and stable energy supply.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026