Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Schroeder - Definitely Not. Who Can Actually Represent Europe in Negotiations with Russia"

Foreign Affairs Minister Andriy Sybiga confirmed that there are candidates from Europe for talks with Russia, but the Kremlin will not determine who they are. According to Politico, the real choice is between Merkel, Stubb, and Draghi.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

"Schroeder - Definitely Not. Who Can Actually Represent Europe in Negotiations with Russia"
Андрій Сибіга (Фото: МЗС)

The question of who will represent Europe in possible peace negotiations with Russia has moved beyond abstract discussions. Putin himself proposed a candidate: former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder — a long-time Kremlin ally who continued traveling to Moscow after 2022 to discuss energy contracts.

Kyiv's response came quickly and without diplomatic evasions.

«There are certain names. I won't name them because this is a diplomatic process, but it's definitely not Schröder»

— Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, online briefing for media

Sybiha then joked that the Russians should stop proposing «Gérard Depardieu, Steven Seagal, I don't know — maybe they'll even bring Orbán as a negotiator on their side». Behind the joke was a specific position: Moscow has no right to appoint Europe's representative.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas called Schröder a «Russian lobbyist» and categorically rejected his candidacy, noting that «giving Russia the right to appoint a negotiator on our behalf would not be very wise». Berlin also officially rejected Putin's proposal, and one German official told Reuters that this was a «false proposal aimed at dividing the Western alliance».

Who's on the list

According to Politico, the real discussion is now centered on three candidates: former Chancellor Angela Merkel, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi.

  • Merkelhas experience in direct negotiations with both Putin and Zelenskyy, speaks Russian fluently. However, previous negotiations in the «Normandy format» yielded no results.
  • Stubbhas mediation experience and previously expressed interest in the mediator role, but Finland's NATO membership could make him unacceptable to Moscow.
  • Draghienjoys broad respect in Europe and is not perceived as either bellicose or sympathetic to the Kremlin. No public signals of his willingness to take on this role have been received.

The most obvious candidate — Kallas herself — has effectively withdrawn. Three EU diplomats warned Politico that the Kremlin would quickly reject Kallas's candidacy because of her tough anti-Russian stance. «Unfortunately, she has excluded herself from among the contenders,» said one senior diplomat.

What's behind this

Sybiha emphasized that Kyiv does not want Europe to replace the United States in the negotiation process. European initiatives should complement Washington's diplomatic efforts. «This should be a complementary direction — not instead, not an alternative,» the minister said.

At the same time, he stressed that Europe must present a united front — a common, consolidated position, a single voice in negotiations with Russia. This is why the question of the negotiator's identity is not a personnel issue but a strategic one: whoever sits down at the table will embody either European unity or its division.

The second round of negotiations in Istanbul on June 2 concluded with an agreement on a prisoner exchange of 1,200 for 1,200, but without any substantive breakthrough. Russia has still not submitted a memorandum with its peace terms, while Ukraine plans to present a detailed plan for achieving sustainable settlement.

If Moscow tries once again to block any acceptable candidate — just as it rejected Kallas for «excessive rigidity» — it will become clear that the Kremlin is not seeking a negotiator but a tool for legitimizing its own conditions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026