Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

NATO Soldiers on Serbian Soil — First Time Since 1999 Bombings

Serbia has launched its first joint exercises with the Alliance, which bombed Belgrade 26 years ago for 78 days. The symbolism of the location is no accident: the exercises are taking place just a few kilometers from Kosovo.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 2 min read

NATO Soldiers on Serbian Soil — First Time Since 1999 Bombings
Військові НАТО на навчаннях у Сербії (Фото: Міністерство оборони Сербії)

On May 12, at the "Jug" base near Bujanović, Serbian and NATO soldiers stood in formation together for the first time. The official formulation from Serbia's Ministry of Defense is "preservation of peace and stability in the region." But the geography and chronology of events speak much more loudly.

26 Years — From Bombs to Joint Exercises

In 1999, NATO bombed Yugoslavia for 78 days, including Belgrade. The same "Allied Force" operation remains an open wound in Serbian collective memory — and is actively used by Moscow as a tool of influence over Serbian audiences. As Al Jazeera reports, these current exercises — the first in the country's history — are "a landmark cooperation between the Balkan country and the Alliance, which less than 30 years ago bombed its capital."

"Cooperation is aimed at preserving peace and stability in the region."

Serbia's Ministry of Defense

Who and Where

The exercises involve approximately 600 military personnel from Serbia, Italy, Romania, and Turkey. Representatives from the United Kingdom, Germany, the United States, France, and Montenegro participate as observers and staff members. The exercises run until May 23 at the "Borovac" training ground and the "Jug" base — several tens of kilometers from the administrative border with Kosovo, whose status Serbia still does not recognize.

The exercises are commanded by Colonel Branislav Stevanović, deputy commander of the Third Army Brigade. The level is tactical, and the goal is to exchange experience.

A Balancing Act That Becomes Increasingly Less Neutral

Serbia is officially not a NATO member and has not submitted an application for membership. At the same time, Belgrade maintains relations with Moscow and Beijing, and the country's Constitution enshrines military neutrality. However, it is precisely this neutrality that allows Serbia to conduct such exercises without formal membership obligations.

Ukraine's ambassador to Serbia, Volodymyr Tolkach, noted in an interview earlier this year that Serbian society is experiencing "collective cognitive dissonance": Russia traditionally appeals to the 1999 bombing in order to prevent Serbs from moving closer to the West. These exercises are a signal that this appeal is working less and less well.

  • Serbia is the only country of the former Yugoslavia that is still not a NATO member and does not have official candidate status
  • Kosovo, whose independence Belgrade does not recognize, is meanwhile actively integrating into Euro-Atlantic structures
  • Turkey and Romania are NATO members and at the same time countries with which Serbia has pragmatic economic ties

The exercises do not change Serbia's formal status. But if Belgrade continues this format and expands it to the operational level — the question about "neutrality" as a real political position, rather than a convenient diplomatic construct, will arise with renewed force.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026