Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Siren for the Sake of Silence: Cabinet Rewrites Function of Alert System"

Since March 2022, a minute of silence at 09:00 has existed as a presidential tradition — but without a unified signal across the country. The government closed this gap by allowing what several cities had already been doing unofficially.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 1 min read

"Siren for the Sake of Silence: Cabinet Rewrites Function of Alert System"
Меморіал у Києві (Фото: Sergey Dolzhenko / EPA)

What has long become commonplace in Kharkiv, Odesa, or Lviv—a sound signal through the city notification system daily at 09:00—has so far lacked a nationwide legal basis. The Cabinet of Ministers has corrected this.

Tradition without mechanism

A daily minute of silence at 09:00 was established by presidential decree No. 143/2022 dated March 16, 2022—to honor the memory of all those who died as a result of Russian armed aggression. However, the decree itself did not specify how to announce it across the entire country. Some cities activated sirens, others did not. No unified practice existed.

Now the Cabinet of Ministers has officially permitted the use of notification systems for this purpose. Daily at 09:00, a nationwide minute of silence will be announced through them.

"We are forming a new culture of remembrance. A daily minute of silence is an important part of it and a manifestation of our respect for the fallen Defenders, both men and women, and civilians."

— Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko

Not just war

Notification systems were also permitted to be used during the all-Ukrainian action "Light a Candle"—held annually on the fourth Saturday of November to honor the memory of victims of the Holodomor of 1932–1933. That is, the decision concerns not only the military context—it establishes a broader infrastructure of state memory.

The paradox of the siren

Notification systems in Ukraine are associated with danger—air raids, evacuation. The state consciously repurposes the same audio channel for the opposite function: not "save yourself," but "stop and remember." In some cities—Kharkiv, Odesa, Kropyvnytskyi, Khmelnytskyi, Lviv—the signal through the city notification system during the minute of silence was already being broadcast. The rest of the country is now connecting.

A question remains open: will regular use of sirens in a "peaceful" function blur their reflex effect—that immediate reaction on which the notification system relies in real danger? The answer will emerge if the practice becomes widespread and psychologists gather sufficient data.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026