Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump: "Iran is about to capitulate" — Tehran's response and the risks to regional security

During talks with G7 leaders, Donald Trump declared a swift "victory" over Iran — rhetoric that coincided with Iranian strikes on military targets. Why this matters for regional security and what it could potentially mean for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Trump: "Iran is about to capitulate" — Tehran's response and the risks to regional security
Дональд Трамп (Фото: ЕРА/Bonnie Cash)

What happened

On March 11, during an online call with G7 leaders, U.S. President Donald Trump said that Iran was allegedly "about to capitulate," boasting about the results of Operation "Epic Fury." According to Axios, three unnamed officials from participating countries reported this.

Two days later, on March 13, Iranian forces reported a series of attacks: rocket launches that crossed Turkish airspace and drone strikes on an Israeli military base in the Beersheba area. Turkish media wrote about rockets striking in the direction of the Incirlik air base, and the Turkish Defense Ministry reported that air defenses were active and neutralized some of the threats (sources: Al Jazeera, Turkish media).

What Trump said and why it matters

"Nobody knows who the leader is, so no one can declare a capitulation"

— Donald Trump, U.S. President (quote according to Axios)

According to Axios interlocutors, Trump also called the new ayatollah, Mojtaba Khamenei, "a weakling" and said the operation should end quickly to avoid a wider war in the future. At the same time, interlocutors noted some uncertainty in Trump's answers about the operation's ultimate objectives and timelines.

Iran's response

"The attacks will continue in the coming hours along with other strikes on Israeli military targets"

— Iranian military statement (cited by Al Jazeera)

Iran officially confirmed strikes on Israeli targets and announced further attacks. This sequence of actions indicates Tehran's readiness to respond to external pressure not only with diplomacy but with military strikes.

G7 leaders' reaction and risks to trade

G7 leaders, according to interlocutors, urged speeding up the conclusion of the operation and expressed concern about the growing economic consequences of the conflict, in particular regarding security in the Strait of Hormuz. For global trade and energy this is a key signal: rising tensions could complicate supply routes and push up energy prices.

What this means for Ukraine

Ukraine is not a party to the conflict, but the consequences of a Middle East escalation could be felt here as well. First, higher energy prices and logistics risks will hit the economy and defense spending. Second, partners' attention being diverted could slow diplomatic and military support if escalation risks become systemic.

Analysts emphasize that in major diplomacy quiet agreements matter more than loud statements: guarantees are now needed that words about "finishing the operation" will be turned into clear plans and mechanisms to deter further escalation (source: LIGA.net).

Conclusion

Washington's rhetoric and Tehran's moves show that the conflict in the Middle East can quickly gain momentum. For Ukraine this means two tasks: monitoring economic risks and working with partners to ensure support remains a priority even amid new international challenges. Whether diplomatic resources will be sufficient to turn loud statements into a controlled end to the crisis is the key question in the coming weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026