Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump Weighs Strikes Against Iran at Meeting with Vance and Gabbard — While Pakistan and Qatar Storm Tehran

On May 22, Trump convened a National Security Council meeting to discuss possible resumption of airstrikes. Simultaneously, a Pakistani field marshal and a Qatari delegation arrived in Tehran in a last-ditch effort to halt the escalation.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

May 23, 2026 · 2 min read

Trump Weighs Strikes Against Iran at Meeting with Vance and Gabbard — While Pakistan and Qatar Storm Tehran
Дональд Трамп (Фото: WILL OLIVER / EPA)

On May 22, U.S. President Donald Trump convened a meeting with the top leadership of his national security team to consider a scenario of returning to combat operations against Iran. According to Axios, citing two anonymous American officials, Trump is seriously considering new strikes — if breakthrough progress is not made in negotiations at the last moment.

The meeting was attended by Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

Negotiations "torment" both sides

An American official familiar with the course of diplomatic efforts described the negotiations with one word — agonizing. According to him, draft agreements "move back and forth daily" without noticeable progress. Mediators — Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey — are trying to secure a "letter of intent": cessation of hostilities and 30 days for negotiations on the nuclear program.

"Trump has become increasingly frustrated in recent days and raised the question of a final large-scale military operation — after which he could declare victory and end the war."

— Axios, a source close to Trump

Parallel diplomatic sprint

While the meeting was taking place in the White House, Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir — the chief mediator between Washington and Tehran since the start of the war — arrived in Tehran. A Qatari delegation also arrived with him. Munir was to meet with General Ahmad Vahidi, commander of the IRGC, who is a key figure in Iran's decision-making system.

The stumbling block remains unchanged: according to Axios, despite Trump's public optimism, Iran has never agreed to permanently abandon uranium enrichment. Tehran's last recorded position is a temporary moratorium, not a complete withdrawal.

Context: from five rounds to a dead end

  • The fourth round of talks in Rome was postponed in early May due to new U.S. sanctions and "contradictory behavior" by Washington — according to the Iranian side.
  • The fifth round (May 23, Rome) concluded with "certain, but not decisive progress," according to Oman's assessment.
  • On May 31, the IAEA recorded a record stockpile of uranium enriched to near-weapons grade in Iran.

The current meeting takes place in this context: not as a preventive measure, but as a response to signs of a breakdown in the diplomatic process.

If the Pakistani-Qatari mission does not produce a signed letter of intent by the end of the weekend — will Trump have a diplomatically justified reason to refrain from the strike he has already brought to the discussion of the national security council?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026