Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump confirmed "strong guarantees" for Ukraine — decision must be approved by Congress

After negotiations in the U.S., Donald Trump confirmed the technical details of the security guarantees agreed by the negotiating teams. This is an important step, because the vote in Congress will determine not only Ukraine's defensive capabilities but also its economic recovery.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 29, 2025 · 2 min read

Trump confirmed "strong guarantees" for Ukraine — decision must be approved by Congress

In high diplomacy, quiet agreements matter more than loud statements

President Volodymyr Zelensky, after talks with Donald Trump, said the American leader confirmed "strong security guarantees" developed by technical and negotiating groups from both sides. According to Zelensky, the next stage is a vote in the U.S. Congress, which should enshrine these agreements at the legislative level.

"All the details we developed up to this point — our technical teams, our negotiators — regarding the specifics of the security guarantees, he confirmed them and confirmed that they will be voted on in the U.S. Congress. This is a very strong agreement."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

What's on the negotiation table

Zelensky also reported discussions of an economic package for reconstruction: the participation of American businesses, special investment conditions, and the launch of talks on a free trade agreement. In addition, the president proposed guarantees with a longer duration — 30–50 years instead of 15; Trump replied that he would take this under consideration.

The role of Congress: legal weight and political scrutiny

Confirmation at the White House is an important political signal, but without lawmakers' approval the guarantees remain declaratory. A vote in Congress means the issue will undergo legal and political scrutiny: the details of mechanisms, financing, and international commitments will be brought into the public domain. Analysts note that this stage will determine the real effectiveness of the guarantees.

Unresolved issues

According to the president, two of the twenty points of the peace plan remain open: the operation of the ZAES (Zaporizhzhia NPP) and the question of control over territories. These issues could become stumbling blocks during the finalization of wording in Congress and in international guarantees.

Why this matters for Ukraine

Security guarantees codified by a strong legislative ally reinforce both the defensive and economic aspects of the country's recovery. Investment and free trade with the United States are long-term markers of trust that will accelerate the rebuilding of infrastructure and markets. However, without clear answers on energy security and territorial control, the effectiveness of such guarantees may be diminished.

What happens next

The key now is to turn political agreements into legislative decisions in Washington. The timing and form of a vote in Congress will determine how quickly and in what form these guarantees will be integrated into state cooperation mechanisms. The remaining open questions will be the subject of negotiations and compromises — and the effectiveness of any guarantees will depend on those outcomes.

Questions to watch: will the U.S. Congress and administration agree on the duration and mechanisms of the guarantees, and will this be accompanied by concrete economic instruments for Ukraine's reconstruction?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026